Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2018

    Added a recent reference on Peirce’s Gamma graphs for modal logic. This describes his first approach via broken cuts rather than the later tinctured sheet approach. I keep meaning to see if there’s anything in the latter close to LSR 2-category of modes approach.

    According to the broken-cut method, possibility is broken cut surrounding solid cut, while necessity is solid cut surrounding broken cut. Since solid cut is negation, broken cut signifies not-necessarily. Easy to see ¬=¬\Box \neg = \neg \lozenge as the same pattern of three cuts, etc.

    In the Alpha case, we’re to think of negated propositions as though written elsewhere on another sheet (or the back of the sheet). There seems to be a three-dimensionality to the graphs, e.g., the conditional as like a tube from one sheet to another, Wikipedia. I gather his later ideas on tinctured graphs had this idea of being inscribed on different sheets.

    diff, v19, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 28th 2018

    Rearranged things a little.

    diff, v21, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJun 4th 2024

    Added three references

    • Nathan Haydon and Paweł Sobociński, Compositional diagrammatic first-order logic, in A.-V. Pietarinen, P. Chapman, L. Bosveld-de Smet, V. Giardino, J. Corter, and S. Linker, editors, Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, pages 402–418, Cham, 2020. Springer International Publishing, [pdf]

    • Filippo Bonchi, Alessandro Di Giorgio, Nathan Haydon and Paweł Sobociński. Diagrammatic algebra of first order logic To appear at LICS, 2024, [arXiv:2401.07055]

    • Filippo Bonchi, Alessandro Di Giorgio, Davide Trotta, When Lawvere meets Peirce: an equational presentation of boolean hyperdoctrines [arXiv:2404.18795]

    diff, v23, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorRodMcGuire
    • CommentTimeJun 4th 2024
    • Filippo Bonchi, Alessandro Di Giorgio, Davide Trotta, When Lawvere meets Peirce: an equational presentation of boolean hyperdoctrines [arXiv:2404.18795]

    Remember to check your links. removed spurious colon.

    diff, v24, current