Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories accessible adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality education elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology newpage noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topological topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2018

    added a subsection “Properties – As algebraic K-theory over the field with one element” (here)

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2018

    have send a question to MO for more: Stable Cohomotopy as KF_1

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2018

    Maybe that Berman thesis I mentioned could count as an answer.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2018

    I should have another look, maybe I missed it: what does the thesis achieve along these lines, beyond the vague comments?

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2018

    Well, yes, only vague comments. He thanks Jack Morava for “suggesting that my results are related to the field with one element”.

    But what kind of “further developments” were you hoping for?

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2018
    • (edited Sep 12th 2018)

    I was looking for more like Guillot’s result, strengthening the analogy between stable cohomotopy and K-theory. How about Chern-characters, Todd classes, A-roof genus, Riemann-Roch theorem over F_1? How about the comparison map between all structures, as we “extend scalars” from F_1 to C. This last question is related to what we are discussing in the thread on Burnside ring.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2018
    • (edited Sep 12th 2018)

    Riemann-Roch theorem over F_1

    This is a major open problem, it is one of the main obstructions to a proof of the Riemann hypothesis via algebraic geometry over 𝔽 1\mathbb{F}_{1} (although for me what the analogue of the Frobenius should be is the main conceptual gap). I think Alain Connes may have some kind of results around Riemann-Roch over 𝔽 1\mathbb{F}_{1} in some setting, though, albeit not strong enough for the applications to the Riemann hypothesis.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2018

    This is a major open problem, it is one of the main obstructions to a proof of the Riemann hypothesis via algebraic geometry over 𝔽 1\mathbb{F}_1

    Thanks for saying this, I didn’t know. What would be a good source to read up on this?

  1. Though I have never focused on it in the same way as I have on other things, I’ve been ruminating off and on upon 𝔽 1\mathbb{F}_{1} for quite a long time, and mostly do not remember where I picked up things! However, perhaps the highlighted text towards the bottom of pg. 20 here would be the kind of thing you are looking for?

    I am not very familiar with Connes’ work, but it seems (regarding my remark about the Frobenius in #7) that he does have an idea of what the analogue of the Frobenius should be, so that the Riemann-Roch theorem actually is the principal obstruction in his setting.

  2. There have been a few developments since the article I linked to as well, see here.

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime7 days ago

    Thanks! I am having a look…