Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
1 to 2 of 2
I see
generalizes the result that a comonad is an oplax 2-functor from to look at similar 2-functors from ’generic’ bicategories. Presumably there’s a dual generalisation on the lax/monad side.
Would it be right to say that there’s no way to reach adjunctions in a 2-category in a similar way in that one cannot blend the lax-ness of the monad aspect and the oplax-ness of the comonad aspect?
Yeah, I don’t know of any way.
1 to 2 of 2