Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorAli Caglayan
   • CommentTimeOct 12th 2018
   • (edited Oct 12th 2018)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Ali Caglayan
   Format: MarkdownItexStart of Eilenberg-MacLane space article. Naming of the constructors is not really ideal, but I don't like the ones in the original paper. The recursion principle is there it may need some more explaining. I have neglected the induction principle for now. Also I have made $G$ an arbitary group, yet the construction of higher EM-spaces require it to be abelian. Given the definition of the higher EM-spaces I don't see what is stopping it from being non-abelian. I would guess that $K(G,2)$ would have $\pi_2$ as the abelianisation of $G$. Which may be interesting. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/homotopytypetheory/revision/Eilenberg-MacLane+spaces/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/homotopytypetheory/show/Eilenberg-MacLane+spaces">current</a>

   Start of Eilenberg-MacLane space article.

   Naming of the constructors is not really ideal, but I don’t like the ones in the original paper. The recursion principle is there it may need some more explaining. I have neglected the induction principle for now.

   Also I have made $G$ an arbitary group, yet the construction of higher EM-spaces require it to be abelian. Given the definition of the higher EM-spaces I don’t see what is stopping it from being non-abelian. I would guess that $K(G,2)$ would have $\pi_2$ as the abelianisation of $G$. Which may be interesting.

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeOct 12th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexYes, if you write down the construction of "$K(G,n)$" for nonabelian $G$, then you should end up with $K(G_{ab},n)$ when $n\gt 1$. Given the construction $K(G,2) = \Vert \Sigma K(G,1) \Vert_2$, this should be a special case of the Hurewicz theorem.

   Yes, if you write down the construction of “$K(G,n)$” for nonabelian $G$, then you should end up with $K(G_{ab},n)$ when $n\gt 1$. Given the construction $K(G,2) = \Vert \Sigma K(G,1) \Vert_2$, this should be a special case of the Hurewicz theorem.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorAli Caglayan
   • CommentTimeOct 12th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Ali Caglayan
   Format: MarkdownItex@Mike Do you know if anybody has written down a proof of Hurewicz in HoTT yet? Even if it's on an evelope?

   @Mike Do you know if anybody has written down a proof of Hurewicz in HoTT yet? Even if it’s on an evelope?

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeOct 13th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI don't think so.

   I don’t think so.