Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 4th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexthe idea and some references <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/the+little+n-disk+operad+is+formal/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/the+little+n-disk+operad+is+formal">current</a>

   the idea and some references

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 4th 2018
   • (edited Nov 4th 2018)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexIn [Campos-Willwacher 16](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/graph+complex#CamposWillwacher16) and followups, the authors highlight that the quasi-iso from the graph complex to the de Rham complex of configuration spaces _sends edges to AKSZ-model Feynman propagators_, hence that those differential forms "$g_{i j}$" pulled back from the boundary spheres of the FM-compactification are essentially to be identified with the Feynman propagators of some (any?) AKSZ sigma-model. This sounds quite plausible, but has this been made precise? Campos-Willwacher seem to indicate that the details for this claim are implicit in articles by Alberto Cattaneo and coauthors. This sounds also rather plausible! But where exactly? Where in the literature would this claim have been substantiated, that the quasi-iso from graph complexes to de Rham complexes of configuration spaces sends edges to AKSZ Feynman propagators? (I have emailed Alberto about it. But if anyone has any insight otherwise, let me know.)

   In Campos-Willwacher 16 and followups, the authors highlight that the quasi-iso from the graph complex to the de Rham complex of configuration spaces sends edges to AKSZ-model Feynman propagators, hence that those differential forms “$g_{i j}$” pulled back from the boundary spheres of the FM-compactification are essentially to be identified with the Feynman propagators of some (any?) AKSZ sigma-model.

   This sounds quite plausible, but has this been made precise? Campos-Willwacher seem to indicate that the details for this claim are implicit in articles by Alberto Cattaneo and coauthors. This sounds also rather plausible!

   But where exactly? Where in the literature would this claim have been substantiated, that the quasi-iso from graph complexes to de Rham complexes of configuration spaces sends edges to AKSZ Feynman propagators?

   (I have emailed Alberto about it. But if anyone has any insight otherwise, let me know.)

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 4th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexah, probably this here: Remark 3.6 in * [[Raul Bott]], [[Alberto Cattaneo]], _Integral invariants of 3-manifolds_, J. Diff. Geom., 48 (1998) 91-133 ([arXiv:dg-ga/9710001](https://arxiv.org/abs/dg-ga/9710001)) re-amplified as remark 11 in * [[Alberto Cattaneo]], [[Pavel Mnev]], _Remarks on Chern-Simons invariants_, Commun.Math.Phys.293:803-836,2010 ([arXiv:0811.2045](https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2045))

   ah, probably this here:

   Remark 3.6 in

   • Raul Bott, Alberto Cattaneo, Integral invariants of 3-manifolds, J. Diff. Geom., 48 (1998) 91-133 (arXiv:dg-ga/9710001)

   re-amplified as remark 11 in

   • Alberto Cattaneo, Pavel Mnev, Remarks on Chern-Simons invariants, Commun.Math.Phys.293:803-836,2010 (arXiv:0811.2045)
4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 4th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexand these two references really mainly recall the observation of Section 2 of * [[Scott Axelrod]], [[Isadore Singer]], _Chern--Simons Perturbation Theory II_, J. Diff. Geom. 39 (1994) 173-213 ([arXiv:hep-th/9304087](http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9304087)) I am collecting these pointers [here](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Fulton-MacPherson+operad#ReferencesPropagator) at _[[Fulton-MacPherson operad]]_, for the moment, but this should eventually get its own discussion somewhere...

   and these two references really mainly recall the observation of Section 2 of

   • Scott Axelrod, Isadore Singer, Chern–Simons Perturbation Theory II, J. Diff. Geom. 39 (1994) 173-213 (arXiv:hep-th/9304087)

   I am collecting these pointers here at Fulton-MacPherson operad, for the moment, but this should eventually get its own discussion somewhere…

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
   • CommentTimeMar 30th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Dmitri Pavlov
   Format: MarkdownItexAdded a reference: The following paper constructs a canonical chain of formality quasiisomorphisms for the operad of chains on framed little disks and the operad of chains on little disks. The construction is done in terms of logarithmic algebraic geometry and is remarkable for being rational (and indeed definable integrally) in de Rham cohomology: * [[Dmitry Vaintrob]], _Formality of little disks and algebraic geometry_, [arXiv:2103.15054](https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.15054). <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/the+little+n-disk+operad+is+formal/7">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/the+little+n-disk+operad+is+formal/7">v7</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/the+little+n-disk+operad+is+formal">current</a>

   Added a reference:

   The following paper constructs a canonical chain of formality quasiisomorphisms for the operad of chains on framed little disks and the operad of chains on little disks. The construction is done in terms of logarithmic algebraic geometry and is remarkable for being rational (and indeed definable integrally) in de Rham cohomology:

   • Dmitry Vaintrob, Formality of little disks and algebraic geometry, arXiv:2103.15054.

   diff, v7, current