Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthornLab edit announcer
   • CommentTimeAug 21st 2019
   • PermaLink
   Author: nLab edit announcer
   Format: MarkdownItexLink to S5 and S4(m) Ammar Husain <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/the+logic+S5%28m%29/6">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/the+logic+S5%28m%29/6">v6</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/the+logic+S5%28m%29">current</a>

   Link to S5 and S4(m)

   Ammar Husain

   diff, v6, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthornLab edit announcer
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2022
   • PermaLink
   Author: nLab edit announcer
   Format: MarkdownItex[[Tim Porter]] wrote the following question on a now-removed query box: +-- {: .query} [[Tim Porter]] It would be good to have some discussion on this axiom. (Donald Rumsfeld's known unknowns has been worked to death, (although sometimes quite well done as [here](http://wn.com/modal_logic)), so please... something worth saying :-)). This might stray over to a new entry as I would hope to see what there is to say especially looking to models of 'why' an agent 'knows' something. My query is whether that aspect has been explored and if so where. My feeling is that in S5 (and elsewhere) the reasons may give a groupoid-like structure (see below about the Kripke semantics) for the geometric semantics. =-- Anonymous <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/the+logic+S5%28m%29/7">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/the+logic+S5%28m%29/7">v7</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/the+logic+S5%28m%29">current</a>

   Tim Porter wrote the following question on a now-removed query box:

   +– {: .query} Tim Porter It would be good to have some discussion on this axiom. (Donald Rumsfeld’s known unknowns has been worked to death, (although sometimes quite well done as here), so please… something worth saying :-)). This might stray over to a new entry as I would hope to see what there is to say especially looking to models of ’why’ an agent ’knows’ something. My query is whether that aspect has been explored and if so where. My feeling is that in S5 (and elsewhere) the reasons may give a groupoid-like structure (see below about the Kripke semantics) for the geometric semantics. =–

   Anonymous

   diff, v7, current

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 16th 2023
   • (edited Jul 16th 2023)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexhappened again onto this entry and tried to fix it up a little more: * replaced the Idea-section with a more informative sentence * finally fixed the typesetting error (a spurious dollar sign) in the "proof" which was causing followup misrenderings * changed the page name from "the logic S5(m)" to a more canonical title The entry is still not in good shape, but I leave it as is for the moment. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/S5%28m%29+modal+logic/8">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/S5%28m%29+modal+logic/8">v8</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/S5%28m%29+modal+logic">current</a>

   happened again onto this entry and tried to fix it up a little more:

   • replaced the Idea-section with a more informative sentence

   • finally fixed the typesetting error (a spurious dollar sign) in the “proof” which was causing followup misrenderings

   • changed the page name from “the logic S5(m)” to a more canonical title

   The entry is still not in good shape, but I leave it as is for the moment.

   diff, v8, current