Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeApr 22nd 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexCame across this categorification of [[pro-object]]. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/2-pro-object/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/2-pro-object">current</a>

   Came across this categorification of pro-object.

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeApr 22nd 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexI've been sniffing around a categorified Stone/Isbell duality at the [nCafe](https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2020/04/ultracategories_and_2monads.html), hence the interest in 2-pro-objects. I see it hasn't been taken up much. There's a use in * Yuliang Huang, Giulio Orecchia, Matthieu Romagny, _Unramified F-divided objects and the étale fundamental pro-groupoid in positive characteristic_, ([arXiv:1906.05072](https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05072)) to construct the étale fundamental pro-groupoid of a flat finitely presented algebraic stack. I wonder what $2Pro(FP Cat)$ is for finitely-presented categories.

   I’ve been sniffing around a categorified Stone/Isbell duality at the nCafe, hence the interest in 2-pro-objects. I see it hasn’t been taken up much. There’s a use in

   • Yuliang Huang, Giulio Orecchia, Matthieu Romagny, Unramified F-divided objects and the étale fundamental pro-groupoid in positive characteristic, (arXiv:1906.05072)

   to construct the étale fundamental pro-groupoid of a flat finitely presented algebraic stack.

   I wonder what $2Pro(FP Cat)$ is for finitely-presented categories.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeApr 22nd 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexFor what its worth in the original work on shape theory, predating Borsuk by a long time, D. E. Christie (1944) used a homotopy version of 2-pro-object to define his invariants. The idea of homotopy coherent pro-objects was used by Batanin in his work on strong shape theory and of course, comes into Lurie's work.

   For what its worth in the original work on shape theory, predating Borsuk by a long time, D. E. Christie (1944) used a homotopy version of 2-pro-object to define his invariants. The idea of homotopy coherent pro-objects was used by Batanin in his work on strong shape theory and of course, comes into Lurie’s work.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeOct 22nd 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexAdded * [[Maria Emilia Descotte]], _A theory of 2-pro-objects, a theory of 2-model 2-categories and the 2-model structure for 2-Pro(C)_, ([arXiv:2010.10636](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.10636)) <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/2-pro-object/3">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/2-pro-object/3">v3</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/2-pro-object">current</a>

   Added

   • Maria Emilia Descotte, A theory of 2-pro-objects, a theory of 2-model 2-categories and the 2-model structure for 2-Pro(C), (arXiv:2010.10636)

   diff, v3, current