Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
For completeness I have added pointer to
though there should really be some accompanying discussion of how this form of the statement is related to the usual one in terms of presheaves.
This old entry needs some attention concerning how it does or does not speak regarding size issues.
Where the fully faithfulness is stated first (here) the entry does speak as if large -categories are being considered, and I guess it should indeed hold in this generality, but the reference offered, namely HTT Prop. 5.1.3.1, speaks of small -categories (namely simplicial sets, regarded as stand-ins for small quasi-categories).
Further down under “Naturalness” (here) large -categories are mentioned more explicitly, and that’s now also what the reference considers (HTT, Prop. 5.3.6.10), but neither talks about fully-faithfulness at this point.
added pointer to:
but that also speaks about Yoneda for small -categories…
added pointer to:
This does seem to be formulated in the generality of large (but locally small, of course) -categories.
I have made more explicit in the text pointer to
for the -Yoneda lemma over possibly large -categories
for the -Yoneda embedding over possibly large -categories.
Pointer to recent article:
Added
1 to 9 of 9