Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 14th 2020
    • (edited Aug 14th 2020)

    Have fixed a typo in the wording of the proof of this Prop, which was kinldy pointed out in another thread (here).

    diff, v172, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 14th 2020
    • (edited Aug 14th 2020)

    [duplicate, page was saving slowly]

  1. Fixed some typos.


    diff, v179, current

  2. Fixed more typos.


    diff, v181, current

  3. Fixed typos.


    diff, v181, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 30th 2023

    Thanks for all this!

  4. homogenized some confusion between generic ground field vs real numbers in the definition of topological vector bundle.

    Jonas Frey

    diff, v184, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 12th 2023


    I have (here) fixed a typo you introduced (:-) and further adjusted the wording a little, for clarity.

    diff, v185, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 12th 2023

    Now I notice that the very last line of the entry appears un-rendered, as literal code

      [[!include topology - contents]]

    This is probably caused by some syntax error somewhwhere inside the source code.

    Usually such errors can be spotted easily by the fact that everything after them appears garbled, but in the present case all else seems to be rendering well, so I don’t readily see how to fix this issue.

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 27th 2023
    I have found some small mistakes.

    Example 2.29, ∂(a,b) should be equal to ∂[a,b]={a,b}.
    Example 6.2, inclusions became projections on the second diagram.
    Example 6.10, inconsistent names for functions f,g/f1,f2 throughout
  5. Thanks!!

    I have (here) fixed a typo you introduced (:-) and further adjusted the wording a little, for clarity.


    diff, v186, current

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 25th 2023
    • (edited Jul 25th 2023)

    Anonymous’, I see that you fixed a typo in the formula here.

    Thanks for that.

    But why is it that you duplicate my log message from #8? What’s going on here? Is this intentional or is this due to a funny glitch in the software that I am unaware of?

    diff, v188, current

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorzhevelt
    • CommentTimeJun 6th 2024

    In definition 1.16, subsequence should be defined as order-preserving injection, isn’t it? As in sequence.

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 7th 2024

    Yes. Thanks. I have fixed it now (here).

    diff, v191, current