Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 8th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexPage created, but author did not leave any comments. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/equivariant+formal+group/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/equivariant+formal+group">current</a>

   Page created, but author did not leave any comments.

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeNov 8th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexI was just wondering if there are _global_ equivariant versions of such constructions, and came across a wiki some homotopy theorists were running -- [Problems in homotopy theory](https://topology-octopus.herokuapp.com/problemsinhomotopytheory/show/HomePage). Not too many pages, but there is at [Equivariant homotopy theory](https://topology-octopus.herokuapp.com/problemsinhomotopytheory/show/Equivariant+homotopy+theory) > Abrams-Kriz works only for finite abelian groups, mostly because they have good duals. Is there a good notion of global equivariant formal group laws, in the fashion on Bohmann and Schwede? Does it good interpretation algebraically (Is there a Lazard object?) or homotopically? > (S. Schwede) In global equivariant homotopy theory, the role of complex bordism is the universal “globally complex oriented theory”; the coefficients of global complex bordism have a very rich algebraic structure (global power functor with Euler classes). What is the universal property that the coefficients enjoy?

   I was just wondering if there are global equivariant versions of such constructions, and came across a wiki some homotopy theorists were running – Problems in homotopy theory. Not too many pages, but there is at Equivariant homotopy theory

   Abrams-Kriz works only for finite abelian groups, mostly because they have good duals. Is there a good notion of global equivariant formal group laws, in the fashion on Bohmann and Schwede? Does it good interpretation algebraically (Is there a Lazard object?) or homotopically?

   (S. Schwede) In global equivariant homotopy theory, the role of complex bordism is the universal “globally complex oriented theory”; the coefficients of global complex bordism have a very rich algebraic structure (global power functor with Euler classes). What is the universal property that the coefficients enjoy?

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 8th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexWhat about equivariant elliptic formal group laws? I don't see these discussed anywhere.

   What about equivariant elliptic formal group laws? I don’t see these discussed anywhere.