Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeMay 9th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexWhen I click on a post in the discussion "2-Limits" from my feed reader, it takes me to a blank page that shows no comments. But if I delete the parameter "&page=2limits" from the URL, then the page displays as it should again. [Here](http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Vanilla/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1237&page=2limits&Focus=10159#Comment_10159) is the broken link. This only seems to happen with that particular discussion. I'm guessing that maybe the forum software is getting confused by the "2" at the beginning and thinking that it should show the "second" page of comments, only there isn't any such?

   When I click on a post in the discussion “2-Limits” from my feed reader, it takes me to a blank page that shows no comments. But if I delete the parameter “&page=2limits” from the URL, then the page displays as it should again. Here is the broken link. This only seems to happen with that particular discussion. I’m guessing that maybe the forum software is getting confused by the “2” at the beginning and thinking that it should show the “second” page of comments, only there isn’t any such?

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Andrew Stacey
   Format: MarkdownItexI think I've fixed this. I couldn't see any reason why the page name was included in the URL, and it was being included in the place where the page _number_ should have been so even if it should be in the URL somewhere, then that isn't the right place. Hopefully, this hasn't broken anything else. (I'll contact the writer of this particular extension to see what's going on here) Please check that things are working as they should now.

   I think I’ve fixed this. I couldn’t see any reason why the page name was included in the URL, and it was being included in the place where the page number should have been so even if it should be in the URL somewhere, then that isn’t the right place. Hopefully, this hasn’t broken anything else.

   (I’ll contact the writer of this particular extension to see what’s going on here)

   Please check that things are working as they should now.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexIf I click on the broken link Mike supplies I get the usual forum page, and '1 to 12 of 12' top and bottom, but no comments in between them at all.

   If I click on the broken link Mike supplies I get the usual forum page, and ’1 to 12 of 12’ top and bottom, but no comments in between them at all.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItex@ David: Yes, that's what I get too. Andrew has not fixed this link (which was never correctly formed), but presumably he has fixed the feed so that it no longer produces this bad link?

   @ David:

   Yes, that’s what I get too.

   Andrew has not fixed this link (which was never correctly formed), but presumably he has fixed the feed so that it no longer produces this bad link?

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Andrew Stacey
   Format: MarkdownItexWot Toby said.

   Wot Toby said.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexHard to test that until someone posts something at a discussion whose name begins with a number...

   Hard to test that until someone posts something at a discussion whose name begins with a number…

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Andrew Stacey
   Format: MarkdownItexIt's a bit odd that we didn't see the bug earlier. We've had lots and lots of discussions with titles like "∞-category of ∞-categories". Why didn't they trigger it?

   It’s a bit odd that we didn’t see the bug earlier. We’ve had lots and lots of discussions with titles like “∞-category of ∞-categories”. Why didn’t they trigger it?

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex> We've had lots and lots of discussions with titles like "∞-category of ∞-categories". Alas, we have not arrived at that holy goal yet. We are still stuck with the $(\infty,1)$-category of $(\infty,1)$-categories, mostly. ;-)

   We’ve had lots and lots of discussions with titles like “∞-category of ∞-categories”.

   Alas, we have not arrived at that holy goal yet. We are still stuck with the $(\infty,1)$-category of $(\infty,1)$-categories, mostly. ;-)

9. • CommentRowNumber9.
   • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Andrew Stacey
   Format: MarkdownItexOkay, I just added a comment at the discussion on 2-limits. Did everything work as it should?

   Okay, I just added a comment at the discussion on 2-limits. Did everything work as it should?

10. • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeMay 13th 2010
    • PermaLink
    Author: Mike Shulman
    Format: MarkdownItexLooks good to me; thanks!

    Looks good to me; thanks!