Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 13th 2010

    back then I had a discussion with Toby about the two very long diagrams at model structure on simplicial presheaves.

    I didn’t use to mind that they stretched way across the screen ,as that is what the scrollbar of the browser window is for. But now that they wildly overlap with the floating table of contents, it’s a mess.

    I guess that means one should put these diagrams into their own scrollbar boxes. I think there is a command for that, but I forget which one. Does anyone know?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMay 14th 2010

    I put in some code that, in theory, ought to work. Unfortunately, it breaks something. I will leave it up for a moment, in case anybody wants to look at it, while I test on the Sandbox.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMay 14th 2010

    OK, the bug here is this: I have to change all of the &s (which normally the parser is smart enough to realise are iTeX &s and not XHTML &s) into &s to make it work.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMay 14th 2010

    So, to sum up, here is what you must do to put something into its own little horizontal scrollbar box:

    1. Add <div style="overflow:auto" markdown="1"> at the top of it.
    2. Add </div> at the bottom of it.
    3. Change any & in it (other than any & which is part of an XHTML character entity reference) to &amp; (which, by the way, is an example of an XHTML character entity reference).

    I would regard that (3) is necessary to be a bug. (It ought to be taken care of automatically as part of the markdown="1" business.) Fortunately it is harmless in this sense: to remove the horizontal scrollbox, you only have to undo (1) and (2); you do not have to undo (3).

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMay 14th 2010

    Incidentally, one might argue that all displayed math should automatically be placed in a horizontal scrollbox like this. (I don’t mean that we should do it by hand every time but that Instiki should do it for us as part of the CSS for displayed iTeX.) The scrollbar doesn’t show up unless it is needed (at least not on my browser, and I think that the meaning of setting overflow to auto is precisely that it should show up if and only if it is needed), so we usually wouldn’t notice this. But when we do, it would be handy.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 14th 2010

    Thanks, Toby!! Great.