Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorvarkor
   • CommentTimeApr 14th 2023
   • PermaLink
   Author: varkor
   Format: MarkdownItexCreate a stub. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/conservative+cocompletion/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/conservative+cocompletion">current</a>

   Create a stub.

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorvarkor
   • CommentTimeApr 22nd 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: varkor
   Format: MarkdownItexAdded reference to Makkai--Paré. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/conservative+cocompletion/2">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/conservative+cocompletion/2">v2</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/conservative+cocompletion">current</a>

   Added reference to Makkai–Paré.

   diff, v2, current

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeApr 24th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexWhy does one need to take the closure under small colimits? Isn't $[C^{op},Set]_\Phi$ already cocomplete, because it's reflective in $[C^{op},Set]$? I thought this was the point of the Freyd-Kelly paper [Categories of continuous functors](https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2014/02/categories_of_continuous_funct.html).

   Why does one need to take the closure under small colimits? Isn’t $[C^{op},Set]_\Phi$ already cocomplete, because it’s reflective in $[C^{op},Set]$? I thought this was the point of the Freyd-Kelly paper Categories of continuous functors.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorvarkor
   • CommentTimeApr 25th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: varkor
   Format: MarkdownItexModified the explicit description of the conservative cocompletion, which was unnecessarily convoluted. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/conservative+cocompletion/5">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/conservative+cocompletion/5">v5</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/conservative+cocompletion">current</a>

   Modified the explicit description of the conservative cocompletion, which was unnecessarily convoluted.

   diff, v5, current

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorvarkor
   • CommentTimeApr 25th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: varkor
   Format: MarkdownItexMention a consequence of the existence of the conservative cocompletion. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/conservative+cocompletion/7">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/conservative+cocompletion/7">v7</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/conservative+cocompletion">current</a>

   Mention a consequence of the existence of the conservative cocompletion.

   diff, v7, current

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorʇɐ
   • CommentTimeApr 25th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: ʇɐ
   Format: MarkdownItexRestored a _co-_ (haplololologized by [revision 5](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/conservative+cocompletion/5)), for nsistency. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/conservative+cocompletion/8">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/conservative+cocompletion/8">v8</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/conservative+cocompletion">current</a>

   Restored a co- (haplololologized by revision 5), for nsistency.

   diff, v8, current