Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorJohn Baez
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2023

    Explained why the square of the finite power set functor is (or “can be made into”) the monad for Boolean algebras.

    diff, v14, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorJohn Baez
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2023

    I corrected my description of the monad for boolean algebras.

    diff, v16, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorPause706
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2024
    The part about morphisms between Boolean algebras seems odd to me
    " BoolAlg is the category whose objects are boolean algebras and whose morphisms are lattice homomorphisms, that is functions which preserve finitary meets and joins (equivalently, binary meets and joins and the top and bottom elements); it follows that the homomorphisms preserve negation. " From the first paragraph of description.

    I don't get how they are equivalent; in particular why lattice homomorphisms between boolean algebras must preserve top and bottom. It only preserves them on the image (I think this follows from 1 v a = 1 and 0 v a = a both being positive formulas) and a counterexample would be the map from the trivial bool alg with 1 element to the 2 element boolean algebra, clearly this does not preserve bottom and top. Another less trivial counter, the 2 element boolean alg maps into the square lattice, if we pick the top and 1 element directly beneath that of the latter, we get a lattice homo not preserving alg homos.

    Also I don't get why we specify binary and finitary meets since they should be equivalent via induction. f(avbvc) = f(avb) v f(c) = f(a) v f(b) v f(c).

    Thanks for reading