Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 26th 2010

    Added a section with a little bit of detail on model structures on cochain complexes in non-negative degree to model structure on chain complexes.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 29th 2010

    I now finished adding a detailed proof of the model structure on non-negatively graded cochain complexes of abelian groups with fibrations the degreewise surjections (and weak equivalences the usual quasi-isos).

    In this subsection.

    The same proof should go through for non-negatively graded chain complexes.

    The result seems to be standard or maybe folk lore(?), but I had trouble tracking down an explicit proof. Explicit standard proofs are widely available for the case that the ambient category has all objects injective, but I am not aware of one for the ambient category being AbAb. However, I wouldn’t be surprised at all to hear you say “But this is in Quillen’s age old article xyz!” or the like. If so, please do.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2010

    added a little bit of the central statements of Christensen-Hovey’s article to model structure on unboiunded chain complexes

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 23rd 2010

    added at model structure on chain complexes a paragraph (in a new Properties-section) on Quillen adjunctions from complxes of sheaves into simplicial sheaves. But did not get into the discussion of the passage to the local structure for the moment.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeNov 23rd 2010

    I am glad that unbounded complexes started to appear in nlab. Assuming that everything is bounded and in characteristics zero, hence equivalent to (co)simplicial picture was repeling many algebraic geometers for example from using nlab, and I am glad to see it is moving toward covering the wider traditional scope.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 23rd 2010

    I had two small mistakes in the statement of the model structure in terms of GG-monomorphisms in the section general results. I think I have fixed things now.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 23rd 2010

    I started a section Left/right exact functors and Quillen adjunctions but I have to dashh off now

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 23rd 2010

    I am glad that unbounded complexes started to appear in nlab.

    Already since a few months!

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2011
    • (edited Mar 17th 2011)

    Dmitry (Roytenberg) says there is at least one typo somewhere on model structure on chain complexes where it says “chain” where it must say “cochain” or conversely. I’ll try to sort this out with him tomorrow.

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2011

    I have polished the organization of the section on complexes in non-negative degree a bit.

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2012
    • (edited Sep 5th 2012)

    to model structure on chain complexes I have added after the statement of the injective Quillen model structure the remark

    This means that a chain complex C Ch (𝒜)C_\bullet \in Ch_{\bullet}(\mathcal{A}) is a cofibrant object in the injective model structure precisely if it consists of projective modules. Accordingly, a cofibrant resolution in the injective model structure on chain complexes is precisely what in homological algebra is called a projective resolution.

    This way the traditional definition of (left) derived functor in homological algebra relates to the general notion of left derived functor. See there for more details.

    I thought I had similar remarks about the relation of model category theory to traditional homological algebra added long ago. Certainly I did in the Idea-sections, but maybe I never spelled out the details. Yet.

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2012

    Surely you mean this paragraph to be about the projective model structure?

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2012
    • (edited Sep 5th 2012)

    Thanks, fixed.

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthoradeelkh
    • CommentTimeJun 7th 2013
    • (edited Jun 7th 2013)

    In the unbounded complexes section, I added a subsection on the approach of Gillespie using cotorsion pairs. In connection with that I also created

    Soon I plan to also add a discussion on the third approach, by Cisinski-Deglise (which Urs has already added the reference to).

    • CommentRowNumber15.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 19th 2013
    • (edited Jul 19th 2013)

    have finally given the projective model structure on UNbounded chain complexes its own section, citing the results by Hovey-Palmieri-Strickland, Schwede-Shipley and Rezk-Schwede-Shipley.