Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2010

    I noticed that augmented simplicial set did not point anywhere, so i created the entry. But have no energy to put anything of substance there right now.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2010

    I started to put down some details, but I suddenly have to go, so I’ll finish it in a few hours.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2010
    • (edited Sep 1st 2010)

    I put in the observation that an augmented simplicial set is the same as an ordinary simplicial set with a map to a constant simplicial set. Also, there is an isomorphism of categories sSet +sSet 2× sSetSetsSet_+ \simeq sSet^\mathbf{2}\times_{sSet} Set, but I didn’t put this in yet.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2010

    I finally filled in my gaps.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2010

    regarding degeneracy maps, there isn’t one from X 1X_{-1} to X 0X_0, and there only one face map the other way. The sentence about ’for each natural number’ dealing with the case n=1n=-1 for face maps is a bit slippery and requires a bit too much negative thinking that early in the article, IMHO. I like the exposition otherwise, and I can’t think how to nicely rewrite it at the moment.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2010

    Also we should put in that every simplicial set XX is canonically augmented over π 0(X)\pi_0(X).

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2010

    Done. I actually put in both the left and right adjoints to the underlying unaugmented simplicial set.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2010

    I have expanded the entry more.

    • Moved all that was in the Idea-section to the Definition section and wrote a more genuine Idea-section.

    • Exapnded in the Definition-section a bit, in particular highlighted the new simplicial identity in degree -1.

    • Started a section with examples.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthoratmacen
    • CommentTimeMay 18th 2019
    There’s a problem for me with the adjunction graphic. The text “Layer 1” appears over some other stuff. It looks like a problem with an SVG.
    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthoratmacen
    • CommentTimeMay 18th 2019
    Odd. It looks fine in both the previous revision and the diff.
    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthoratmacen
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2019
    Re #9: I’m talking about the one in the “Properties” section.
    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2019

    Maybe you should add another item to the bug report list

    Just to say that, from what Richard kept saying, currently the main version of any page is rendered using his modified rendering engine, while all pages in history etc. use the old engine. That should explain why some effect appears here but not there.

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthoratmacen
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2019
    Thanks for that info, Urs. I’ve added this to the new bug list.
  1. Link to category ASSet.

    Also, the svg image for the diagram at the end of the Properties section isn’t displaying properly for me, but I don’t know how to fix that.

    diff, v16, current