Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2024
    • (edited Mar 1st 2024)

    An edit to normed ring is being discussed in another thread, here.

    diff, v11, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 2nd 2024

    added the original reference:

    For what it’s worth, the extra axiom in not stated there, either.

    diff, v14, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 2nd 2024

    In Bosch, Güntzer & Remmert 1984 the axiom is also not stated, but they prove that it follows from their axioms (Prop. 3).

    diff, v14, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2024

    added pointer to:

    • Shigeo Ozaki, Sadao Kashiwagi, Teruo Tsuboi, Note on Normed Rings, Science Reports of the Tokyo Bunrika Daigaku, Section A 4 98/103 (1953) 277-282 [jstor:43700402]

    diff, v16, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2024

    After the definition (here), I have replaced the pointer to Berkovich 2009, def. 1.2.1 and the claim that Berkovich is missing an axiom (instead the issue seems to be that Berkovich discusses the non-Archimedean case) by pointer to Ozaki, Kashiwagi & Tsuboi 1953.

    diff, v17, current