Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: 2-Lawvere theory

Bottom of Page

1 to 8 of 8

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2010

    created stub for 2-Lawvere theory

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2010

    Any reason you decided to put the 2- on Lawvere rather than on theory, as Power+Lack did?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2010

    Any reason you decided to put the 2- on Lawvere rather than on theory, as Power+Lack did?

    I feel never sure on how to do this. I think I was led by my earlier decision to say (infinity,1)-algebraic theory. Is that a bad idea? Maybe.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2010

    Well, I would consider the 2-ness as applying to the theory-ness rather than the Lawvere-ness, i.e. a 2-theory is a more general thing and a Lawvere one, or an algebraic one for that matter (or a regular one, a geometric one, etc) is only a particular case of it. But as long as there are redirects I’m not too fussed either way.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorJoe Moeller
    • CommentTimeOct 5th 2019

    added some references

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorJoe Moeller
    • CommentTimeJan 19th 2020
    • (edited Jan 19th 2020)
    In the future work section of Yanofsky's The Syntax of Coherence, it's suggested that developing multi-sorted 2-theories could allow theories for closed monoidal categories, among other things. Does anybody know if multi-sorted 2-theories have been worked on? Also, does the suggestion seem reasonable?
    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJan 19th 2020

    Did you see Mike’s post on n-theories?

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorJoe Moeller
    • CommentTimeJan 20th 2020
    I haven't. Thanks, it was a good read.

1 to 8 of 8

  1.