# Start a new discussion

## Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

## Site Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeOct 26th 2010
• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeSep 24th 2011

added a tiny comment on §\kappa§-symmetry to Green-Schwarz action functional, plus some references. This whole entry deserves to be considerably expanded, but I doubt that I will look into this any time soon.

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeDec 2nd 2011

I have started a Definition-section at Green-Schwarz action functional, amplifying that it precisely a WZW coset model for a given super target.

Thanks for John Huerta for pointing out references!

• CommentRowNumber4.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMay 3rd 2013

added a tad to Green-Schwarz action functional (bit more definition, more commented references). But not done yet.

• CommentRowNumber5.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMay 13th 2013

added some basic remarks on Supercoordinates etc.

• CommentRowNumber6.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMay 22nd 2013

I have been adding lots of little things during the day to Green-Schwarz action functional and related entries.

If you see me active in “Recently revised” and are wondering what’s going on: either ask me specifically if something bugs you, or else please wait a bit: things are converging and in a little while I’ll post a comprehensive story…

• CommentRowNumber7.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJul 25th 2016

The entry Green-Schwarz action functional used to be a collection of advanced facts and references without any discussion of the basics. I have now started to write an Idea section that, hopefully, serves to introduce the subject a little.

• CommentRowNumber8.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeFeb 18th 2019
• (edited Feb 18th 2019)

for a more explicit version of the statement that looks like claiming that the super-AdS version of the GS-string cocycle (WZW term) is trivial in CE-cohomology.

(I had been alerted of this only from arxiv:1808.04470, p. 5 and equation (5.5))

still need to look into this. If this really says the CE-class of that AdS cocycle is trivial, that would be rather strange. Not sure what to make of it yet

• CommentRowNumber9.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeApr 22nd 2020

• CommentRowNumber10.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeMar 6th 2021