Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2010
    • (edited Nov 4th 2010)

    started entries

    But details still need to be filled in.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2010

    I have some stuff typed up on shuffles and can put it somewhere if it would help. Do you want a separate entry on them? They are useful in general so perhaps that would be best.

    There is a nice proof of the crossed complex version of the Eilenberg Zilber theorem in Andy Tonks’ thesis. (I think I have a copy if it is not available elsewhere.)

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2010

    I have some stuff typed up on shuffles and can put it somewhere if it would help.

    That would be great!

    Do you want a separate entry on them? They are useful in general so perhaps that would be best.

    Having a separate page on them won’t hurt. Whatever you think is better suited.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2010

    Tim: if you do it, it would be great if you could do it today . Tomorrow I’ll be distributing this stuff to students.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2010

    I will see what I can do. I will send you the tex file as well and like that you can use it in that form if you like.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2010

    Thanks for the file. I am a bit time pressured. Will have to see what I can do myself.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2010

    I should be able to put a version up, but was rushed this morning.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2010

    now there’s a definition at Eilenberg-Zilber map

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2010

    …and now finally a definition at Alexander-Whitney map

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2010

    I understand that the map has been given first bei Eilenberg and MacLane. But it is known as the Eilenberg-Zilber map.

    Not that this surprises me. But any opinions on what to do with the terminology on the nLab?