Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 31st 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexhave created [[fpqc-site]]

   have created fpqc-site

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeDec 31st 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexWhy the dash ? I mean fppq, fpqc and etale should be on equal footing. Besides dash has no function here. fpqc is an adjective and site is a noun.

   Why the dash ? I mean fppq, fpqc and etale should be on equal footing. Besides dash has no function here. fpqc is an adjective and site is a noun.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 31st 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexOkay, not sure. If you think the dash should be removed, please do.

   Okay, not sure. If you think the dash should be removed, please do.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJan 1st 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexThe part of the definition which I surmise corresponds to the 'quasicompact' (which is just compactness minus Hausdorffness) is not very clear. In particular, things like $T_{s(i)}$ are not defined. Can this be stated as ' there is a finite subcover', or something perhaps only a little more technical, such as "there exists for every covering family a finite subfamily which also covers"?

   The part of the definition which I surmise corresponds to the ’quasicompact’ (which is just compactness minus Hausdorffness) is not very clear. In particular, things like $T_{s(i)}$ are not defined. Can this be stated as ’ there is a finite subcover’, or something perhaps only a little more technical, such as “there exists for every covering family a finite subfamily which also covers”?

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 1st 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexYes, I wrote just a hasty stub. You should expand it. Zoran seems to have said he wanted to take care of the circle of entries surrounding algebraic stacks, too.

   Yes, I wrote just a hasty stub. You should expand it. Zoran seems to have said he wanted to take care of the circle of entries surrounding algebraic stacks, too.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeJan 3rd 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexI will be back to full work in a couple of days, and yes, I do plan to help with algebraic stacks.

   I will be back to full work in a couple of days, and yes, I do plan to help with algebraic stacks.