Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeFeb 13th 2011
   • (edited Feb 13th 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexYou may or may not recall the observation, recorded at [[Lie group cohomology]], that there is a natural map from the Segal-Blanc-Brylinski refinement of Lie group cohomology to the intrinsic cohomology of Lie groups when regarded as [[smooth infinity-groupoid]]s. For a while i did not know how to see whether this natural map is an equivalence, as one would hope it is. The subtlety is that the Cech-formula that Brylinski gives for refined Lie group cohomology corresponds to making a degreewise cofibrant replacement of $\mathbf{B}G$ in $Smooth \infty Grpd$ and then taking the diagonal, and there is no reason that this diagonal is itself still cofibrant (and I don't think it is). So while Segal-Brylinski Lie group cohomology is finer and less naive than naive Lie group cohomology, it wasn't clear (to me) that it is fine enough and reproduces the "correct" cohomology. So one had to argue that for certain coefficients the degreewise cofibrant resolution in $[CartSp^{op}, sSet]_{proj,loc}$ is already sufficient for computing the [[derived hom space]]. It was only yesterday that I realized that this is a corollary of the general result at [[function algebras on infinity-stacks]] once we embed [[smooth infinity-groupoid]] into [[synthetic differential infinity-groupoid]]s. So I believe I have a proof now. I have written it out in [[synthetic differential infinity-groupoid]] in the section <a href="http://nlab.mathforge.org/nlab/show/synthetic+differential+infinity-groupoid#StrucCohomology">Cohomology and principal $\infty$-bundles</a>.

   You may or may not recall the observation, recorded at Lie group cohomology, that there is a natural map from the Segal-Blanc-Brylinski refinement of Lie group cohomology to the intrinsic cohomology of Lie groups when regarded as smooth infinity-groupoids.

   For a while i did not know how to see whether this natural map is an equivalence, as one would hope it is. The subtlety is that the Cech-formula that Brylinski gives for refined Lie group cohomology corresponds to making a degreewise cofibrant replacement of $\mathbf{B}G$ in $Smooth \infty Grpd$ and then taking the diagonal, and there is no reason that this diagonal is itself still cofibrant (and I don’t think it is). So while Segal-Brylinski Lie group cohomology is finer and less naive than naive Lie group cohomology, it wasn’t clear (to me) that it is fine enough and reproduces the “correct” cohomology.

   So one had to argue that for certain coefficients the degreewise cofibrant resolution in $[CartSp^{op}, sSet]_{proj,loc}$ is already sufficient for computing the derived hom space. It was only yesterday that I realized that this is a corollary of the general result at function algebras on infinity-stacks once we embed smooth infinity-groupoid into synthetic differential infinity-groupoids.

   So I believe I have a proof now. I have written it out in synthetic differential infinity-groupoid in the section Cohomology and principal $\infty$-bundles.