Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 6th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexstub for [[conserved current]]

   stub for conserved current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeApr 21st 2015
   • (edited Apr 21st 2015)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have added to _[[conserved current]]_ under _[References -- Dickey-Lie bracket on currents](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/conserved+current#ReferencesDickeyBracket)_ pointer to _[Barnich-Fulp-Lada-Stasheff 97](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/conserved+current#BarnichFulpLadaStasheff97)_ together with the statement that the construction in that article gives an $L_\infty$-algebra that is $L_\infty$-equivalent to the Dickey-Lie bracket. That statement of $L_\infty$-equivalence is not explicit in the article, thought it is pretty immediate. Thanks to Domenico Fiorenza for cross-checking. (Eventually the entry deserves to have a genuine discussion of these issues in its main text. I'll try to add it once we have an article finished that we are currently preparing on this topic.)

   I have added to conserved current under References – Dickey-Lie bracket on currents pointer to Barnich-Fulp-Lada-Stasheff 97 together with the statement that the construction in that article gives an $L_\infty$-algebra that is $L_\infty$-equivalent to the Dickey-Lie bracket.

   That statement of $L_\infty$-equivalence is not explicit in the article, thought it is pretty immediate. Thanks to Domenico Fiorenza for cross-checking.

   (Eventually the entry deserves to have a genuine discussion of these issues in its main text. I’ll try to add it once we have an article finished that we are currently preparing on this topic.)

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeJul 26th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexThis page should probably link to [[current]]. I made the latter read more smoothly. It suggests a relation between the different senses of 'current'. Can we not say something clearer here?

   This page should probably link to current. I made the latter read more smoothly. It suggests a relation between the different senses of ’current’. Can we not say something clearer here?

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 26th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks for alerting us of this. I'll try to find time to do something about this.

   Thanks for alerting us of this. I’ll try to find time to do something about this.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 28th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex[test]

   [test]