Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJun 17th 2011
   • (edited Jun 17th 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexyou may recall (okay, probably not ;-) what I once wrote in the entry on [[exterior differential system]]s: while in the classical literature these are thought of as dg-ideals in a de Rham complex, we should think of them as sub-Lie algebroids of tangent Lie algebroids. Since exterior differential systems over X encode and are encoded by partial differential equations on functions on X, this means that such sub-Lie algebroids are partial differential equations. This perspective is amplified much more in the literature on D-modules: I think we can think of a D-scheme as an infinite-order analog of a Lie algebroid, which is the corresponding first-order notion. The Jet-bundle with its D-scheme structure is the infinite-order analog of the tangent Lie algebroid. And sub-D-schemes of Jet-D-schemes are partial differential equations, this is what everyone on D-geometry tells you first. So I think there is a nice story here.

   you may recall (okay, probably not ;-) what I once wrote in the entry on exterior differential systems: while in the classical literature these are thought of as dg-ideals in a de Rham complex, we should think of them as sub-Lie algebroids of tangent Lie algebroids.

   Since exterior differential systems over X encode and are encoded by partial differential equations on functions on X, this means that such sub-Lie algebroids are partial differential equations.

   This perspective is amplified much more in the literature on D-modules: I think we can think of a D-scheme as an infinite-order analog of a Lie algebroid, which is the corresponding first-order notion. The Jet-bundle with its D-scheme structure is the infinite-order analog of the tangent Lie algebroid.

   And sub-D-schemes of Jet-D-schemes are partial differential equations, this is what everyone on D-geometry tells you first.

   So I think there is a nice story here.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeJun 19th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexIn a viewpoint, D-modules are based on $D_X$ of course, the Grothendieck's notion of a [[regular differential operator]]. The PDE people look more generally, allowing diff operators more general coefficients in front, and allowing more general, weak solutions of various kinds and the main business is that sometimes the apparent generality reduces a lot for good equations and one has increase of regularity for free. Another interesting direction, which is very relevant for physics, and was discovered in mathematical physics by Maslov independently is the calculus of [[pseudodifferential operator]]s and more, generally, Fourier differential operators. Part of the effort in the [[microlocal analysis]] of Japanese school of [[Michio Sato]] and [[Masaki Kashiwara]] was to extends the D-module methods to such setups.

   In a viewpoint, D-modules are based on $D_X$ of course, the Grothendieck’s notion of a regular differential operator. The PDE people look more generally, allowing diff operators more general coefficients in front, and allowing more general, weak solutions of various kinds and the main business is that sometimes the apparent generality reduces a lot for good equations and one has increase of regularity for free. Another interesting direction, which is very relevant for physics, and was discovered in mathematical physics by Maslov independently is the calculus of pseudodifferential operators and more, generally, Fourier differential operators. Part of the effort in the microlocal analysis of Japanese school of Michio Sato and Masaki Kashiwara was to extends the D-module methods to such setups.