Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeOct 15th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexstarted something called [[table of orthogonal groups and related]] and included it into the relevant entries

   started something called table of orthogonal groups and related and included it into the relevant entries

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeOct 15th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexGrammatically, this should be [[table of orthogonal and related groups]]. However, because redirects don't work with inclusions, I have not changed the name (nor inserted a redirect).

   Grammatically, this should be table of orthogonal and related groups. However, because redirects don’t work with inclusions, I have not changed the name (nor inserted a redirect).

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeOct 15th 2011
   • (edited Oct 15th 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexAll right, thanks. I guess I was meaning to give a kind of abbreviated version of "orthogonal groups and related structures", but if it does not work out, let's change it.

   All right, thanks. I guess I was meaning to give a kind of abbreviated version of “orthogonal groups and related structures”, but if it does not work out, let’s change it.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeOct 15th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexActually, I don't think the grammar of "table of orthogonal and related groups" is all that hot either. Why not "table of orthogonal groups and related groups/structures"?

   Actually, I don’t think the grammar of “table of orthogonal and related groups” is all that hot either. Why not “table of orthogonal groups and related groups/structures”?

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeOct 16th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexAre they all groups? If not, then Urs #3 has it right.

   Are they all groups? If not, then Urs #3 has it right.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeOct 16th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItex[[orthogonal group and related structures]] as Urs pointed out in 3 is a nice name.

   orthogonal group and related structures as Urs pointed out in 3 is a nice name.

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeOct 16th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex> Are they all groups? So far they are all groups.

   Are they all groups?

   So far they are all groups.

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeOct 17th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexI should add something about quantum orthogonal groups...

   I should add something about quantum orthogonal groups…

9. • CommentRowNumber9.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeOct 17th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexI think a quantum group counts as a related structure, not as a related group (despite the word 'group'). :-)

   I think a quantum group counts as a related structure, not as a related group (despite the word ’group’). :-)

10. • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2011
    • PermaLink
    Author: zskoda
    Format: MarkdownItexRight, isn't this intention of the page as said in 3 ?

    Right, isn’t this intention of the page as said in 3 ?