Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2012

    am starting an entry contact manifold

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2012

    Any more idea about whether contact geometry is likely to be a general feature of geometry?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2012
    • (edited Jun 27th 2012)

    Yes, that’s why I made that note:

    in as far as we are dealing with regular contact manifolds, they are precisely nothing but the total spaces of circle bundles with connection.

    So here is one way to look at it from general abstraction:

    in H:=SmoothGrpd\mathbf{H} := Smooth\infty Grpd a circle bundle with connection on some XX is given by a morphism

    :XBU(1) conn. \nabla: X \to \mathbf{B}U(1)_{conn} \,.

    One can then form the automorphism group

    Aut() \mathbf{Aut}(\nabla)

    in the slice \infty-topos H /BU(1)\mathbf{H}_{/\mathbf{B}U(1)}. This, is, as discussed in that entry that you point to, the quantomorphism group of \nabla regarded as a prequantum circle bundle.

    Contact geometry provides one presentation of this computation: we incarnate \nabla equivalently as an Ehresmann connection 1-fom AA on the total space PP of the circle bundle PXP \to X. Then (P,A)(P,A) is a regular contact structure and the above automorphisms in the slice \infty-topos are identified with the diffeomorphisms PPP \to P that preserves AA, hence with those contactomorphisms that are, again, quantomorphisms.

    In summary: circle bundles with connection are a “first principles” notion in cohesive homotopy type theory, and regular contact geometry is one way of looking at them, regarded as objects in the slice, as above.

    I am not sure yet if there is anything along these lines to be said about the non-regular case of contact geometry. I might just say “it’s an approximation to the regular case when a prequantum circle bundle does not quite exist”. But maybe there is more to it.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 13th 2013

    at contact manifold I have added the explicit statement of the Boothby-Wang theorem.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 14th 2013
    • (edited Apr 14th 2013)

    In Arnold’s book Mathematical methods of classical mechacnics, one of the appendices is dedicated to contact manifolds. Arnol’d explains that the main idea is that the contact manifolds are maximally away from an integrability proprerty; the 1-form is introduced precisely to express this idea. His exposition is crisp, but not that easy.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 14th 2013

    Hi Zoran,

    not sure what the intent of the comment is. But please feel invited to add discussion to contact manifold!

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)