# Start a new discussion

## Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

## Site Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeNov 18th 2009
• (edited Nov 18th 2009)

I changed the notation that Mike complained about at small object argument, also changed it at cofibrantly generated model category and at combinatorial model category: I use $rlp(-)$ and $llp(-)$ for collections with right and left lifting property, respectively

• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeNov 18th 2009

I strengthened the main theorem at small object argument as requested by Mike. Added a remark on how Top fails to be presentable but still has a small object argument.

Moved all the query boxes to the bottom, as they seem to be addressed now.

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeNov 18th 2009

expanded the definition at combinatorial model category

• CommentRowNumber4.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeNov 19th 2009
• (edited Nov 19th 2009)

I added the illustrating diagrams and other symbolic exprressions to Mike's description of the proof of the small object argument

• CommentRowNumber5.
• CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
• CommentTimeAug 29th 2018

Harry Gindi pointed out that this page has disappeared. Presumably it’s something to do with that pushout diagram which feature in the last changes.

Harry seems to suggest that other pages have been effected.

• CommentRowNumber6.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeAug 29th 2018

fixed it. The cause was a “missing” newline in the code for the floating toc.

We had seen this in one other entry before, and there may be others that have “typos” (with respect to the new parser) in the floating toc code, but this should not affect many entries.

1. I’m impressed, Urs! Thanks for fixing. When I get the chance, I can try to run some check on the rendered source to make sure that it parses as HTML, which should allow us to identify any remaining problematic pages.

• CommentRowNumber8.
• CommentAuthorGuest
• CommentTimeJan 22nd 2021

Hi,

If I am not mistaken I believe the $Z_0 \coprod_{L_{(I/j)}}K_{(I/j)}$ in the push-out diagram in the small+object+argument#the_construction-section should be $Z_0\coprod_{K_{(I/j)}}L_{(I/j)}$. (I.e. the $K$ and $L$ swapped.) If this is correct the way it is right now I am sorry!

Vincent

• CommentRowNumber9.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJan 22nd 2021

Thanks, fixed now.