Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeSep 4th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexVery stubby beginning of [[BHK interpretation]].

   Very stubby beginning of BHK interpretation.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeSep 4th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have added a link to the entry from _[[intuitionistic logic]]_

   I have added a link to the entry from intuitionistic logic

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorZhen Lin
   • CommentTimeSep 5th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Zhen Lin
   Format: MarkdownItexThe propositional fragment of the BHK interpretation corresponds very neatly to free bicartesian closed categories, but I haven't seen any nice way of extending this to full first-order intuitionistic logic.

   The propositional fragment of the BHK interpretation corresponds very neatly to free bicartesian closed categories, but I haven’t seen any nice way of extending this to full first-order intuitionistic logic.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeSep 5th 2012
   • (edited Sep 5th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have linked _[[BHK interpretation]]_ with _[[propositons as types]]_, being alerted by Robert Harper's post _[Extensionality, Intensionality, and Brouwer’s Dictum](http://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2012/08/11/extensionality-intensionality-and-brouwers-dictum/)_

   I have linked BHK interpretation with propositons as types, being alerted by Robert Harper’s post Extensionality, Intensionality, and Brouwer’s Dictum

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJun 15th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI added a comment to [[BHK interpretation]] about the questionability of Brouwer's inclusion.

   I added a comment to BHK interpretation about the questionability of Brouwer’s inclusion.