Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeSep 5th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexexpanded at _[[Chan-Paton bundle]]_ the Idea-section and added two pointers to lecture notes. Also expanded at _[[Freed-Witten anomaly]]_ a little.

   expanded at Chan-Paton bundle the Idea-section and added two pointers to lecture notes. Also expanded at Freed-Witten anomaly a little.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorperezl.alonso
   • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: perezl.alonso
   Format: MarkdownItexI'm not sure I understand how to derive the transformation $A\mapsto A+a, B\mapsto B+d a$, is it supposed to be an automorphism of $Fields$, hence a natural transformation in the arrow category?

   I’m not sure I understand how to derive the transformation $A\mapsto A+a, B\mapsto B+d a$, is it supposed to be an automorphism of $Fields$, hence a natural transformation in the arrow category?

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have re-typeset the diagram in `tikz`, to make it clearer: [here](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Chan-Paton+bundle#TransformationsOfBackgroundBField). In words: the field content is a twisted unitary connection modeled by a map in the slice over $\mathbf{B}^2 U(1)_{conn}$ into $\mathbf{Fields}$, with the domain encoding the twist(ing gerbe), and so acting on this by automorphisms of the twist means to pre-compose this slice-map by an automorphism of the domain, which, if we fix the actual domain space $X$, is just a gauge-transformation of the gerbe connection, locally by some 1-form $\alpha$. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Chan-Paton+bundle/9">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Chan-Paton+bundle/9">v9</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Chan-Paton+bundle">current</a>

   I have re-typeset the diagram in tikz, to make it clearer: here.

   In words: the field content is a twisted unitary connection modeled by a map in the slice over $\mathbf{B}^2 U(1)_{conn}$ into $\mathbf{Fields}$, with the domain encoding the twist(ing gerbe), and so acting on this by automorphisms of the twist means to pre-compose this slice-map by an automorphism of the domain, which, if we fix the actual domain space $X$, is just a gauge-transformation of the gerbe connection, locally by some 1-form $\alpha$.

   diff, v9, current