Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: axiom

Bottom of Page

1 to 8 of 8

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeSep 25th 2012

    Edited the definition at the article axiom.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 25th 2012

    Thanks. Given the recent discussion about sequent calculus, I am wondering: where it currently says “in a sequent calculus” should we more precisely say “in a sequent calculus or in a system of natural deduction”?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeSep 26th 2012

    Of course I agree with that, and I made some changes to reflect this. See what you think now.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 26th 2012
    • (edited Sep 26th 2012)

    Okay, thanks. We have that entry logical framework which maybe might serve to wrap up that list of possibilities. But I am not really sure.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeSep 26th 2012

    Yeah, pretty much I think. I made “deductive system” point to logical framework.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeSep 27th 2012

    Slight edits, including explicitly using the term ‘logical framework’, which I think is what we want there.

    The most significant edit is that I generalised the example sequent to have lists for antecedent and succedent. This made reading the following text a little confusing, so I made the example show only one sequent. (The text still says a collection of sequents like the one in the example.)

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeSep 27th 2012

    the term ‘logical framework’, which I think is what we want there.

    We were having a related discussion here.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2023

    the list of Examples (here) was essentially empty. I have now !included foundational axiom - contents.

    diff, v16, current

1 to 8 of 8

  1.