Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJul 13th 2013
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 13th 2013

    I have added some more hyperlinks and cross-linked with monoidal category, bimonoidal category, etc.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJul 13th 2013

    Added another example, and a reference.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeMar 5th 2017

    At duoidal category I have:

    • corrected the example of endofunctors (they are not normal in general) and added an example of profunctors.
    • generalized the notion of “commutative monoid” to the case of a non-normal duoidal category, in which case the object first has to be assumed to be “strong”.
    • mentioned the notion of “virtual duoidal category”, to which it seems nearly all the definitions in a duoidal category can be generalized.
    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorJon Beardsley
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2021

    I was looking at this entry recently and had a question about it which has a possibly obvious answer: it is mentioned that if A and B are monoidal then Fun(A,B) is equipped with a duoidal structure with one tensor product being the pointwise one, and the other being Day convolution. Later in the entry, it states that the category of monoids with respect to one monoidal structure, in a duoidal category, is monoidal with respect to the other monoidal structure. My question is the following: suppose we take B to be a monoidal category and A=1, the unit category (with respect to the cartesian product of categories). Then algebras in Fun(1,B), with respect to the pointwise monoidal structure are exactly algebras in B, and algebras in Fun(1,B) with respect to the Day convolution are also algebras in B. Then it seems that for Alg(Fun(1,B)), with respect to either monoidal structure, has a monoidal structure given by the underlying monoidal structure in B. However, at least in the usual cases, this cannot happen in a monoidal category, as far as I know.

    So, for this to make sense, do we need to require B to be (at least) braided monoidal?

  1. States the definition of produoidals from “Tannaka Duality and Convolution for Duoidal Categories (Booker, Street, 2013)”. I plan to start the article on produoidals next.

    Mario Román

    diff, v20, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeJan 1st 2024

    Added a reference to Duoidal categories, measuring comonoids and enrichment.

    diff, v21, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeMay 1st 2024

    Added a related paper of Došen and Petrić.

    diff, v23, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 1st 2024
    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2024
    • (edited May 2nd 2024)
    • Gabriella Böhm, (Hopf) bimonoids in duoidal categories, Chapter in Hopf algebras and their generalizations from a category theoretical point of view, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics __2226_ (2018) (chapter doi)

    • Gabriella Böhm, Y. Chen, L. Zhang, On Hopf monoids in duoidal categories, J. Algebra 394 (2013) 139–172 (2013) MR3092715 doi

    • Y. Chen, G. Böhm, Weak bimonoids in duoidal categories, J. Pure Appl. Math. 218:12 (2014) 2240–2273 doi

    diff, v25, current