Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: quantization of Yang-Mills theory

Bottom of Page

1 to 9 of 9

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 17th 2013
    • (edited Jul 17th 2013)

    I keep having the need to point to something like mass gap problem. So now I created a stub for it, just so that the links works. Has to be expanded, clearly.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorigor
    • CommentTimeJul 20th 2013
    Urs, have you actually taken a look at the notes by Yablon referenced at the bottom of that page? I don't think their content is at the high technical level that the context implies.
    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 20th 2013

    I only glanced over them, admittedly. Can you suggest a good technical survey? I’d be happy to replace this by something better.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorigor
    • CommentTimeJul 21st 2013
    I've always thought that the Jaffe-Witten article was a good technical survey in itself. Certainly it doesn't go into the details of how many of the results they refer to had been established. But I also don't know of a survey article that actually does that. A more technical survey would essentially have to be a treatise on constructive field theory and I don't know whether there have been any good ones published since Glimm and Jaffe.
    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 30th 2017
    • (edited Sep 30th 2017)

    I have extracted the key paragraphs from Jaffe-Witten’s “problem description” as a full quote to the entries quantization of Yang-Mills theory (here) and also Yang-Mills theory (here):

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2019

    Took out the redirect from ’mass gap problem’ since this also is a redirect for mass gap.

    diff, v15, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2020
    • (edited Jan 23rd 2020)

    Added the missing ’n’ in ’Millennium’. By the way, Urs, you have this misspelling at Hypothesis H, including in slides I can’t change.

    If anyone has the energy there are 22 pages with this wrong spelling.

    diff, v16, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2020

    Oh, wow. Thanks for alerting me. I’ll fix it…

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2020

    Thanks again.

    Have fixed it now at Hypothesis H (schreiber). Will fix the remaining occurrences on the nLab later today.

1 to 9 of 9

  1.