Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I wrote in one of the entries question to Toby why the creation of history page at the places where just a renaming is done ? Why not just chnaging the name and leaving the redirect. The way it is done now separates old versions into a differently named entry. Just renaming it and having a redirect is easier and does not have such bad effects.
It must be something profound I do not understand behind the scenes :)
I'm not creating any history pages, I'm only slightly renaming old history pages; see the discussion Forward slashes in names (towards the end).
Almost all of these pages were originally created before we had redirects; a few of them are accidental duplicates in one way or another. But none of them are being created now, only moved around.
To be more explicit: One of the pages that I just moved used to be fibered n category -- history. Now it's fibered n category > history. And instead of the contents being
See n-fibration.
category: redirect
which was originally a very ad hoc form, now it's
which is supposed to look smooth and elegant.
But the sad fact that there are two pages, this one and the new title n-fibration, was established back on April 20, before we had redirects.
And on July 1, after we got redirects, that is when fibered n category was moved to fibered n category -- history and the redirect was placed at n-fibration; the discussion for that was at Redirects -- what now?.
So I was right -- this made sense only before redirects:) But I did not know that such moves were done just before. I like more > sign as it is now better then -- sign which was before! Thanks again.
Thanks a lot !
OK, I'm glad you're happy about it.
By the way, Andrew, if you're reading this, the link to fibered n category > history from the Forum doesn't work; it links to http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/fibered+n+category+>+history instead of to http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/fibered+n+category+>+history as it should.
William, it would be cool to have a git blame like feature for the nlab. Perhaps, this could be done in the edit box ?
I’m not entirely sure how difficult it would be to implement this, and hence whether it is worth the trouble.
You probably mean Richard!
Hi Bas, I’m sure it could be done. I would probably see it as extra functionality in the /diff endpoint. What information exactly would you like to see? Just the author who made the last edit to each line and when this edit was made, or something more?
Sorry, yes Richard Williamson!
I think just the author would be a good start.
1 to 10 of 10