Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeAug 14th 2013
   • (edited Aug 14th 2013)
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexI created a small page for [[compact symplectic group]], which is not the same as the [[symplectic group]], and added some sentences at both to disambiguate. I'm also working on an entry [[orthogonal group of an inner product space]], which will give the general treatment that covers $O(n)$, $U(n)$ and $Sp(n)$ (and other cases of mixed signature, like $O(n,m)$). There are interesting charts for $O(n,\mathbb{K})$ using its Lie algebra (in fact various tangent spaces) which don't come from the exponential mapping, and my aim is to get a reasonably full treatment of these in there.

   I created a small page for compact symplectic group, which is not the same as the symplectic group, and added some sentences at both to disambiguate. I’m also working on an entry orthogonal group of an inner product space, which will give the general treatment that covers $O(n)$, $U(n)$ and $Sp(n)$ (and other cases of mixed signature, like $O(n,m)$).

   There are interesting charts for $O(n,\mathbb{K})$ using its Lie algebra (in fact various tangent spaces) which don’t come from the exponential mapping, and my aim is to get a reasonably full treatment of these in there.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeAug 14th 2013
   • (edited Aug 14th 2013)
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexClearly we get a real manifold when $\mathbb{K}$ is a associative division algebra over $\mathbb{R}$, but what about *-algebras over other complete fields? Just wondering.

   Clearly we get a real manifold when $\mathbb{K}$ is a associative division algebra over $\mathbb{R}$, but what about *-algebras over other complete fields? Just wondering.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeAug 26th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexI added another characterization of $Sp(n)$. I would be inclined to put all of the material at [[orthogonal group of an inner product space]] at [[orthogonal group]]. Most links will go to the latter, even for $\mathrm{O}(p,q)$.

   I added another characterization of $Sp(n)$.

   I would be inclined to put all of the material at orthogonal group of an inner product space at orthogonal group. Most links will go to the latter, even for $\mathrm{O}(p,q)$.