Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014

    I have tried to expand a bit the text at the beginning of the category:people entry Alexander Grothendieck, mention more of what his work was about, add more hyperlinks. It could still be much improved, but right now it reads as follows:

    The french mathematician Alexandre Grothendieck, (in English usually Alexander Grothendieck), has created a work whose influence has shown him to be the greatest pure mathematician of the 20th century; and his ideas continue to be developed in this century.

    Initially working on topological vector spaces and analysis, Grothendieck then made revolutionary advances in algebraic geometry by developing sheaf and topos theory and abelian sheaf cohomology and formulating algebraic geometry in these terms (locally ringed spaces, schemes). Later topos theory further developed independently and today serves as the foundation also for other kinds of geometry. Notably its homotopy theoretic refinement to higher topos theory serves as the foundation for modern derived algebraic geometry.

    Grothendieck’s work is documented in texts known as EGA (with Dieudonné), an early account FGA, and the many volume account SGA of the seminars at l’IHÉS, Bures-sur-Yvette, where he was based at the time. (See the wikipedia article for some indication of the story from there until the early 1980s.)

    By the way, in view of the recent objection to referring to people as “famous” in category:people entries: the lead-in sentence here is not due to me, it has been this way all along. One might feel that it should be rephrased, but I leave that to those who feel strongly about it.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014

    I for one feel it should be rephrased. Surely “greatest pure mathematician of the 20th century” is a matter of debate. (This obsession with linearly ordering intelligence, creativity, etc. When will people ever learn that intelligences are not linearly ordered, and maybe not even partially ordered?) Also, I would capitalize French (the lower case makes me think it was written by a Francophone).

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014
    • (edited Mar 11th 2014)

    How about this:

    The French mathematician Alexandre Grothendieck, (in English usually Alexander Grothendieck), has created a very influential body of work foundational for (algebraic) geometry but also for modern mathematics more generally. He is widely regarded as a singularly important figure of 20th century mathematics and his ideas continue to be flourishing in the 21st century.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014


    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014

    @Todd: of course, although I agree about linearly ordering people which is very silly (and annoying), he could be the top element in a poset which was not linearly ordered. :-)

    (In other words, it is thinking that the order makes sense that is the bother not the fact that it is linear.)

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014
    • (edited Mar 11th 2014)

    Initially working on topological vector spaces and analysis,

    Not only working – his work on the topic of tensor products of topological vector spaces is the most important work on that topic.

    By the way, Popescu’s 1973 book calls Yoneda lemma Yoneda-Grothendieck lemma. Anybody knows a bit on this part of the history ?

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014

    Could be… although the case of Erdős (as just one example) makes me think that the debate is hopelessly apples-to-oranges, as well as invidious and basically fruitless. Agree with your second sentence I think.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014
    • (edited Mar 11th 2014)

    This on tvs is from the previous version of the entry the way it used to be all along. Please split it off as a paragraph and expand.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorThomas Holder
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014
    • (edited May 6th 2015)
    It seems that Grothendieck has always insisted on being called 'Alexander', e.g. SGA1 has 'dirigé par Alexander Grothendieck' on the title page -even the Hachette dictionnaire lists him as 'Alexander', a form that has, by the way, nothing particularly English about it, in fact Grothendieck was born in Berlin. In parenthesis: 'a singularly important' sounds like 'democratic monarchy' to me.
    @Zoran: A pupil (Nishida ?) of Yoneda has sent a commemorating letter to the catlist a few years ago on the occassion of Yoneda's death where he tells the story about the Yoneda lemma which was cooked up in a café at the Gare du Nord by Yoneda, then studying with a grant in Paris, and the visiting Saunders MacLane, so the attribution and publication of the lemma is presumably due to the latter. You should be able to find the blog entry on searching the catlist. How Grothendieck enters the picture here I don't know but Lawvere occasionally even speaks of a 'Yoneda-Cayley-Dedekind-Grothendieck embedding' in this context.
    Speaking of Grothendieck: Lawvere recalls his 1989 visit to Grothendieck and their discussion about an edition of 'Pursuing Stacks' in his obituary for Aurelio Carboni ( It might be worthwhile to add a link to the 'Pursuing Stacks'.
    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014

    Thanks for the pointer to that story by Lawvere. I had seen that before, but forgotten about it. Have added it now here.

    Also I didn’t know the story about the Yonda lemma originating at Gare du Nord. That’s a neat bit of information. Hopefully somebody finds the time to chase down that catlist post!

    (Finally regarding the comment on “singularly important”. I don’t get what you mean. I checked to see if I am making some stupid mistake, but it seems I didn’t. For a change.)

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorThomas Holder
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014
    Concerning ' a singularly important' : my point is that it is a bit like calling him 'a king of 20th century math' , it is a kind of a compromise formula. As you do the authorial work here feel free use the words you think appropriate, actually I apologize for the parenthesis, which isn't in my competence to make.
    Ironically, I remember to have read an interview with Luc Illusie (?) where the question came up who was the greatest mathematican of the 20th century, Grothendieck or Serre. I think Illusie choose Grothendieck as a matter of style disagreeing in choice with the interlocutor.
    The piece on Yoneda was posted on april, 23th 1996 by KInoshita Yoshiki. Let me know if you have troubles finding it !
    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2014
    • (edited Mar 11th 2014)

    Not sure what compromise you mean. Notice that it’s not just me who does the authorial work, it’s a bunch of people and on this entry I just made a minor addition and an attempt at rephrasing one sentence. On texts that I edit alone, I have a lot less discussion overhead! :-)

    Thanks for the date of the catlist discussion. If nobody else adds it to the entry, maybe I’ll do it some other day.

  1. I will add the link (tomorrow). Meanwhile, it is here:

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2014

    I've rephrased to imply that ‘Alexander’ is the preferred spelling.

    Wikipedia (English) describes Grothendieck as ‘stateless’ (without citation), so I wonder if it would be better to describe him as ‘francophone’ rather than ‘French’. But I don't know what's behind that (did he renounce his French citizenship? did he never have any citizenship? or what?)

    • CommentRowNumber15.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2014
    • (edited Mar 12th 2014)

    What about ’European’? He had parents from two European countries, and lived and worked (and probably still lives) in France, which is a third. ‘Stateless’ is a term that went out of current language use sometime in the 1960s when most of the people who had been refugees after the second world war, began to be absorbed into their countries of adoption. (Its use may need to be reborn in the current political climate!) I believe Alexander never became a French citizen, but I may be wrong.

    There were two good articles in the Notices AMS. in 2004 I have added links to them.

    I have incorporated the ’European’ and made minor changes.

    • CommentRowNumber16.
    • CommentAuthorThomas Holder
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2014
    @Urs: just forget that I said anything about the wording! If I would be that uncomfortable with the entry (which I am not) I could edit myself in the end.
    Concerning Grothendieck's nationality, I think to have read somewhere in Cartier,that, having entered France as a refugee during WW II, Grothendieck had an international passport from the UN after the war. A text in French from Cartier ('Grothendieck et les motifs') cites a juridical statement from Grothendieck from the early 1970s that seems to imply that he had still not acquired French nationality by then. I guess more definite printed information should available to someone interested in this probably from Scharlau's biography.
    The link to Kinoshita is: . MacLane gives 1954 as a date for the private communication in CWM.
    • CommentRowNumber17.
    • CommentAuthorZhen Lin
    • CommentTimeMar 19th 2014

    According to Cartier (p. 9), Grothendieck obtained French citizenship in the 1980s.

    • CommentRowNumber18.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 4th 2020
    • (edited Dec 4th 2020)

    Have added this quote (and am adding it to the top of K-theory):

    The way I first visualized a K-group was as a group of “classes of objects” of an abelian (or more generally, additive) category, such as coherent sheaves on an algebraic variety, or vector bundles, etc. I would presumably have called this group C(X)C(X) (XX being a variety or any other kind of “space”), CC the initial letter of ’class’, but my past in functional analysis may have prevented this, as C(X)C(X) designates also the space of continuous functions on XX (when XX is a topological space). Thus, I reverted to KK instead of CC, since my mother tongue is German, Class = Klasse (in German), and the sounds corresponding to CC and KK are the same.

    According to Courtney’s notes a source for this quote is:

    • A. Bak, Editorial, K-theory 1 (1987), 1

    but I haven’t actually seen that text, or any other authorative source for the quote. If anyone knows a better citation, let’s add it.

    diff, v33, current

    • CommentRowNumber19.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2020

    In that editorial (DOI 10.1007/BF00533984, accessable for me via Sci-Hub), Bak introduces that quote with the following sentence

    Concerning his group and the choice of the letter K, Grothendieck says in his letter of 9 February 1985 to Bruce Magurn:

    No further information provided.

    • CommentRowNumber20.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2020

    Thanks for checking! and for the DOI, have added that to the entry.

    diff, v34, current

  2. Fix typos: Recoltes -> Récoltes, Reminiscenes -> Reminiscences


    diff, v35, current