Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Slide 68 of Riccioni’s talk E11 and M-theory also has a 10A row. Should there be one in your table?
And do you mean to have $SL(5, \mathbb{R})$ for 6d supergravity instead of his $SO(5, 5)$, and $Spin(5, 5)$ for 7d supergravity instead of his $SL(5, \mathbb{R})$?
So those entries should be swapped, right? People seem to differ between $SO(5, 5)$ and $Spin(5,5)$ for 6d.
Thanks. Yes. And yes.
I noticed this last night before going to bed: this is a typo in the original Hull-Townsend 95, table 1?! (Or I am mixed up.)
I am editing now.
Okay, I have fixed that.
So this is striking, that the only other entry besides $10B$ with $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ whose U-duality might be related to automorphic forms (I mean SL-equivariant) is $7d$.
In the other thread we are discussing how quantization of the 7d theory should involve the “$CY3$-generalization” of K3-cohomology…
1 to 6 of 6