Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories newpage noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
  1. I created a stub page for cartographic group, with definitions and a reference. The not-yet-existent article was already linked to from child’s drawing.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2015
    • (edited May 26th 2015)

    Noam, The notion is in fact earlier in the 1977 preprints from Montpellier mentioned in the dessin d’enfant entry:

    The original work on the elementary theory was contained in

    Christine Voisin?, Jean Malgoire?, Cartes cellulaires, Cahiers Mathématiques, 12, Montpellier, 1977.

    Christine Voisin?, Jean Malgoire?, Factorisation de Stein topologique, découpe, Cahiers Mathématiques, 15, Montpellier, 1979.

    Christine Voisin?, Jean Malgoire?, Cartes topologiques infinies et revêtements ramifiés de la sphère, Cahiers Mathématiques, 19, Montpellier, 1980.

    I had been intending to write something for this (for a long time) but have not found / made time. I told Gareth and David about Grothendieck’s work in the 1980s and vice versa so I started by following up the references back in the 1980s but dropped it when it ‘exploded’ as a subject. I had intended to create pages as you are doing so … . I have copies of some of the early material (Iin a box under a bed … not electronic!)

  2. Tim, thanks for the information! I am coming to this subject as an outsider and am not very familiar with the history. I understand that the history has many different threads, though, including some old work in combinatorics on permutation representations of embedded graphs. What specifically is “the notion” that you are referring to above? Do you mean the notion of “cartographic group”? And by “the elementary theory”…you mean the elementary theory of what?

  3. by the way, I was originally interested in this coming from the combinatorics side. The book by Lando & Zvonkin (Graphs on Surfaces and Their Applications) is great, and talks both about combinatorial aspects and the connections to branched coverings of the sphere. More recently I’ve checked out a copy of Schneps’ The Grothendieck Theory of Dessins d’Enfants, where I found the article by Gareth Jones and David Singerman cited in the entry. I am definitely curious about your boxed material…

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2015

    One source is available online:Topology Volume 20, Issue 2, 1981, Pages 191–207 is a paper in French which is relevant (ans is availble in full text pdf!).

    I will have a look for the box file. (In Bangor we ran a seminar on this in the 1980s. I taught a Knot Theory course (for which see my book with Nick Gilbert) and the students seemed to like the Edmonds algorithm and similar stuff. It is very ’doable’, geometric and fun!. (I did not get onto the cartographic group in the course.)

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2015
    • (edited May 26th 2015)

    Noam, BTW if you are interested I will be in Saclay soon we might be able to meet and chat. (A Google search showed you were at INRIA.) I will be at the workshop organised by Samuel Mimram.

    Tim

  4. Tim: yes, I actually work in the same building as Samuel, so that would be great to meet you at the workshop!

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)