Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 24th 2017

    finally, for completeness, there is also locally compact and second-countable spaces are sigma-compact

  1. Am I right that the assumption of Hausdorff-ness serves the only purpose to avoid dealing with different notions of local compactness in case of non-Hausdorff spaces? If so, I would like to add a small comment on the role of the Hausdorff-ness assumption.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2017

    That’s right. I fact I meant not to include the Hausdorff condition, but it seems then I did after all.

    I have removed it now and added a remark after the locally compact clause.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)