Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorPeter Heinig
   • CommentTimeJun 5th 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Peter Heinig
   Format: MarkdownItexCreated [[isomorphic functors]], with some references.

   Created isomorphic functors, with some references.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJun 5th 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI suggest that you stop creating new pages and seek feedback from regulars first. In particular, we do not generally make pages that are synonyms of other pages. Anything you want to write about natural isomorphisms should go on the page [[natural isomorphism]].

   I suggest that you stop creating new pages and seek feedback from regulars first. In particular, we do not generally make pages that are synonyms of other pages. Anything you want to write about natural isomorphisms should go on the page natural isomorphism.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorPeter Heinig
   • CommentTimeJun 6th 2017
   • (edited Jun 6th 2017)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Peter Heinig
   Format: MarkdownItexWill do. Would you prefer I incorporate something of that page into [[natural isomorphism]], or just leave it as it is. And, while somewhat regrettable to me, I would understand when [[isomorphic functors]] is deleted again. The term is very frequently used though, and it is likely to frequently people will search this encyclopedia for that particular phrase. I understand that one could cater to that by having the phrase appear within [[natural transformation]], which it presently does not, though only partially so: when using the search option to search for a phrase which does not have a page of its own, the nLab gives a list of _all_ articles containing the phrase, so someone using the encyclopedia then has to consult several pages.

   Will do. Would you prefer I incorporate something of that page into natural isomorphism, or just leave it as it is. And, while somewhat regrettable to me, I would understand when isomorphic functors is deleted again.

   The term is very frequently used though, and it is likely to frequently people will search this encyclopedia for that particular phrase. I understand that one could cater to that by having the phrase appear within natural transformation, which it presently does not, though only partially so: when using the search option to search for a phrase which does not have a page of its own, the nLab gives a list of all articles containing the phrase, so someone using the encyclopedia then has to consult several pages.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeJun 6th 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItex> I understand that one could cater to that by having the phrase appear within natural transformation, which it presently does not, though only partially so: when using the search option to search for a phrase which does not have a page of its own, the nLab gives a list of all articles containing the phrase, so someone using the encyclopedia then has to consult several pages. I think the evident solution which would cover all of this is to merge [[isomorphic functors]] into [[natural transformation]]. There are instructions for merging at [[HowTo]]. I may get around to doing so soon.

   I understand that one could cater to that by having the phrase appear within natural transformation, which it presently does not, though only partially so: when using the search option to search for a phrase which does not have a page of its own, the nLab gives a list of all articles containing the phrase, so someone using the encyclopedia then has to consult several pages.

   I think the evident solution which would cover all of this is to merge isomorphic functors into natural transformation. There are instructions for merging at HowTo. I may get around to doing so soon.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorPeter Heinig
   • CommentTimeJun 10th 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Peter Heinig
   Format: MarkdownItex> I think the evident solution which would cover all of this is to merge isomorphic functors into natural transformation. There are instructions for merging at HowTo. I may get around to doing so soon. Will take that upon me, and try to get that finished this morning.

   I think the evident solution which would cover all of this is to merge isomorphic functors into natural transformation. There are instructions for merging at HowTo. I may get around to doing so soon.

   Will take that upon me, and try to get that finished this morning.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorPeter Heinig
   • CommentTimeJun 10th 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Peter Heinig
   Format: MarkdownItexMerged [[isomorphic functors]] into [[natural isomorphism]], using the HowTo.

   Merged isomorphic functors into natural isomorphism, using the HowTo.