Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeFeb 23rd 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdowncreated [[shape of an (infinity,1)-topos]]

   created shape of an (infinity,1)-topos

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 19th 2010
   • (edited Mar 19th 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownI added a simple but maybe useful observation to a new section <a href="http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/shape+of+an+(infinity%2C1)-topos#Retract">Shape of an essential retract</a> at [[shape of an (infinity,1)-topos]].

   I added a simple but maybe useful observation to a new section Shape of an essential retract at shape of an (infinity,1)-topos.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeDec 21st 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI noticed that in HTT, Lurie actually defines Pro(C), for a large (∞,1)-category C, to be the (opposite of the) category of *accessible* left-exact functors from C to ∞Gpd. I think that fixes all my worries about it being the wrong definition. I added comments about this to [[shape of an (∞,1)-topos]] and [[pro-object in an (∞,1)-topos]].

   I noticed that in HTT, Lurie actually defines Pro(C), for a large (∞,1)-category C, to be the (opposite of the) category of accessible left-exact functors from C to ∞Gpd. I think that fixes all my worries about it being the wrong definition. I added comments about this to shape of an (∞,1)-topos and pro-object in an (∞,1)-topos.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 21st 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexAh, thanks. My fault. (Your last link is supposed to go to [[pro-object in an (infinity,1)-category]].)

   Ah, thanks. My fault.

   (Your last link is supposed to go to pro-object in an (infinity,1)-category.)