Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 16th 2018

    we didn’t have face

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJan 16th 2018

    What’s your source for this? Wikipedia seems to disagree that it has to be 2-dimensional.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 16th 2018

    Sure. I don’t think we need Wikipedia for that. I added a line.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeJan 16th 2018

    I have seen ’facet’ also used and ’face’ might be restricted to when it can be ’face of’ something higher dimensional (usually by 1, not more).

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 16th 2018
    • (edited Jan 16th 2018)

    By the way, while my entry was clearly stubby, it never said that a face has to be 2-dimensional. If we want to have a fight, I’d rather we have it over something substantial. I am announcing these kinds of trivial edits in order to stick to the etiquette of this particular forum, which, in its role as the “talk-pages” of the nLab, is the place to record edits to the nnLab, trivial as they may be. I’d hope this goes without saying.

    I won’t further touch this entry. All I needed is for a link to “face” in the discussion of loop order of Feynman diagrams to point somewhere. Anyone who feels encyclopedic is invited to work on making this entry the definite source for face-theory on the web.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJan 17th 2018

    it never said that a face has to be 2-dimensional

    It did say that a “2-cell” is called a face. I suppose one might find exotic structures in which “2-cells” need not be 2-dimensional, but usually they are.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJan 17th 2018

    Urs #5: I think you overreacted. My question was an honest one, and I wasn’t picking a fight.