Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
On the orthogonal group page, there is a table of for and . The reference given is the Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics which actually has a table which goes up to and . In a comment to my last MO question, David Roberts suggested that I add these additional groups to the table. I am happy to do this, but as the person who created the table used the same resource, they made a decision to stop at and ; maybe there was a good reason for this.
Should I expand the table or is it fine as is?
Please expand. I extended the table a few years ago for my own interests, but there was no good reason to stop where I did.
I’ve added the additional rows and columns, but now the table is very wide.
I’ve made a couple of modifications to make the width of the table (almost) match the width of the text.
I have also added a table of homotopy groups to the unitary group page.
1 to 5 of 5