# Start a new discussion

## Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

## Site Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorMike Shulman
• CommentTimeJun 5th 2018

• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJun 5th 2018
• (edited Jun 5th 2018)

Fixed the anchor for the reference. It needs to be

  * {#Shulman13} [[Mike Shulman]], *Enriched indexed categories*, [TAC](http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/28/21/28-21abs.html) 2013


  * [[Mike Shulman]], *Enriched indexed categories*, [TAC](http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/28/21/28-21abs.html) 2013
{#Shulman13}


(anchor at the beginning) otherwise the system gets confused.

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJun 5th 2018
• (edited Jun 5th 2018)

added pointer to an online version of the relevant first page of Street 74, which seems to be the (only?) source for the statement that Jean Bénabou made “cosmos” a definition

(all other sources that Google can find cite the nLab for this, if they care to cite anything)

to J. Benabou the word means “bicomplete symmetric monoidal category”, such categories $\mathcal{V}$ being rich enough so that the theory of categories enriched in $\mathcal{V}$ develops to a large extent just as the theory of ordinary categories.

• CommentRowNumber4.
• CommentAuthorMike Shulman
• CommentTimeJun 5th 2018

Re #2, having it at the end works fine for me.

• CommentRowNumber5.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeOct 11th 2021

The way this entry is written (or was, I have adjusted wording slightly for more clarity) it’s no good as a quick reference for the simple concrete notion of bicompleted symmetric closed categories. I am giving Bénabou cosmos its stand-alone entry now and am redirecting the redirects to there.