Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: pointed endofunctor

Bottom of Page

1 to 8 of 8

  1.  

  1. A pointed endofunctor is not pointed object in the endofunctor category, because the terminal object of the category of endofunctors on C is the functor which sends all objects to 1 and all morphisms to the unique morphism 1→1, where 1 is terminal object of category C.

    xiaoniu

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJun 21st 2018

    Hmm… that’s true, given that our page pointed object is all about objects pointed by a map from the terminal object. But there’s certainly a sense in which an object equipped with a map from the unit object is also “pointed”. Maybe “monoidally pointed”?

  3. added definition of pointed endomorphism in a 2-category

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeJun 5th 2023

    Add a reference.

    diff, v9, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 5th 2023

    have touched wording and formatting of the first few paragraphs.

    Added the warning that the notion of pointed endofunctors is not in general a special case of the notion of pointed objects.

    diff, v10, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJun 5th 2023
    • (edited Jun 5th 2023)

    I made a related comment in the discussion page for pointed object, that there are more general notions of pointing out there, involving maps out of the monoidal unit, which specialize to maps out of the terminal object when interpreted in the doctrine of cartesian monoidal categories. The article pointed object is essentially about that specialization (even though you don’t need all finite products to state the definition).

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 5th 2023

    added pointer to:

    • Harvey Wolff, p. 234 of: Free monads and the orthogonal subcategory problem, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 13 3 (1978) 233-242 [doi:10.1016/0022-4049(78)90010-5]

    for an original use of the terminology

    (incidentally, another good example for why it’s a bad idea to denote terminal objects by “11”)

    diff, v11, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJun 5th 2023

    Changed the wording a bit, so as to link more smoothly with the new article pointed object in a monoidal category.

    diff, v12, current

1 to 8 of 8

  1.