Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexa table of logical symbols, to be !included in the relevant entries under "related concepts" <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/logic+symbols+--+table/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/logic+symbols+--+table">current</a>

   a table of logical symbols, to be !included in the relevant entries under “related concepts”

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorIngoBlechschmidt
   • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: IngoBlechschmidt
   Format: MarkdownItexRemarked that "$\neq$" can also mean "apartness". I don't mind removing this entry again, if we decide that the wider table doesn't look good. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/logic+symbols+--+table/3">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/logic+symbols+--+table/3">v3</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/logic+symbols+--+table">current</a>

   Remarked that “$\neq$” can also mean “apartness”. I don’t mind removing this entry again, if we decide that the wider table doesn’t look good.

   diff, v3, current

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2018
   • (edited Jul 3rd 2018)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks, good point. How about just using a slash, as in some of the other entries: *** | $\phantom{A}$symbol$\phantom{A}$ | $\phantom{A}$meaning$\phantom{A}$ | |--------|---------| | $\phantom{A}$$\in$ | $\phantom{A}$[[element]] [[relation]] | | $\phantom{A}$$\,:$ | $\phantom{A}$[[type|typing]] [[relation]] | | $\phantom{A}$$=$ | $\phantom{A}$[[equality]] | | $\phantom{A}$$\vdash$$\phantom{A}$ | $\phantom{A}$[[entailment]] / [[sequent]]$\phantom{A}$ | | $\phantom{A}$$\top$$\phantom{A}$ | $\phantom{A}$[[true]] / [[top]]$\phantom{A}$ | | $\phantom{A}$$\bot$$\phantom{A}$ | $\phantom{A}$[[false]] / [[bottom]]$\phantom{A}$ | | $\phantom{A}$$\Rightarrow$ | $\phantom{A}$[[implication]] | | $\phantom{A}$$\Leftrightarrow$ | $\phantom{A}$[[logical equivalence]] | | $\phantom{A}$$\not$ | $\phantom{A}$[[negation]] | | $\phantom{A}$$\neq$ | $\phantom{A}$[[negation]] of [[equality]] / [[apartness]]$\phantom{A}$ | | $\phantom{A}$$\notin$ | $\phantom{A}$[[negation]] of [[element]] [[relation]] $\phantom{A}$ | | $\phantom{A}$$\exists$ | $\phantom{A}$[[existential quantification]]$\phantom{A}$ | | $\phantom{A}$$\forall$ | $\phantom{A}$[[universal quantification]]$\phantom{A}$ | | $\phantom{A}$$\wedge$ | $\phantom{A}$[[logical conjunction]] | | $\phantom{A}$$\vee$ | $\phantom{A}$[[logical disjunction]] | | $\phantom{A}$$\otimes$$\phantom{A}$ | $\phantom{A}$[[multiplicative conjunction]]$\phantom{A}$ | | $\phantom{A}$$\oplus$$\phantom{A}$ | $\phantom{A}$[[multiplicative disjunction]]$\phantom{A}$ |

   Thanks, good point. How about just using a slash, as in some of the other entries:

   ---

   $\phantom{A}$symbol$\phantom{A}$	$\phantom{A}$meaning$\phantom{A}$
   $\phantom{A}$$\in$	$\phantom{A}$element relation
   $\phantom{A}$$\,:$	$\phantom{A}$typing relation
   $\phantom{A}$$=$	$\phantom{A}$equality
   $\phantom{A}$$\vdash$$\phantom{A}$	$\phantom{A}$entailment / sequent$\phantom{A}$
   $\phantom{A}$$\top$$\phantom{A}$	$\phantom{A}$true / top$\phantom{A}$
   $\phantom{A}$$\bot$$\phantom{A}$	$\phantom{A}$false / bottom$\phantom{A}$
   $\phantom{A}$$\Rightarrow$	$\phantom{A}$implication
   $\phantom{A}$$\Leftrightarrow$	$\phantom{A}$logical equivalence
   $\phantom{A}$$\not$	$\phantom{A}$negation
   $\phantom{A}$$\neq$	$\phantom{A}$negation of equality / apartness$\phantom{A}$
   $\phantom{A}$$\notin$	$\phantom{A}$negation of element relation $\phantom{A}$
   $\phantom{A}$$\exists$	$\phantom{A}$existential quantification$\phantom{A}$
   $\phantom{A}$$\forall$	$\phantom{A}$universal quantification$\phantom{A}$
   $\phantom{A}$$\wedge$	$\phantom{A}$logical conjunction
   $\phantom{A}$$\vee$	$\phantom{A}$logical disjunction
   $\phantom{A}$$\otimes$$\phantom{A}$	$\phantom{A}$multiplicative conjunction$\phantom{A}$
   $\phantom{A}$$\oplus$$\phantom{A}$	$\phantom{A}$multiplicative disjunction$\phantom{A}$

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 7th 2022
   • (edited Nov 7th 2022)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThe second but last line of the `!include`-file *[[logic symbols -- table]]* paired "multiplicative disjunction" with the symbol "$\oplus$" This seems at best non-standard, even according to our own entry *[[multiplicative disjunction]]*. [ edit: Hm, it looks like I myself typed that in [rev 1 ](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/logic+symbols+--+table/1) in 2018 ] I went ahead and * made instead "$\invamp$" appear as the symbol for multiplicative disjunction * added a line *[[additive disjunction]]* for the symbol "$\oplus$" and will start the corresponding entry now <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/logic+symbols+--+table/5">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/logic+symbols+--+table/5">v5</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/logic+symbols+--+table">current</a>

   The second but last line of the !include-file logic symbols – table

   paired “multiplicative disjunction” with the symbol “$\oplus$”

   This seems at best non-standard, even according to our own entry multiplicative disjunction.

   [ edit: Hm, it looks like I myself typed that in rev 1 in 2018 ]

   I went ahead and

   • made instead “$\invamp$” appear as the symbol for multiplicative disjunction

   • added a line additive disjunction for the symbol “$\oplus$” and will start the corresponding entry now

   diff, v5, current

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthornLab edit announcer
   • CommentTimeNov 7th 2022
   • PermaLink
   Author: nLab edit announcer
   Format: MarkdownItexadded line for $\&$ for [[additive conjunction]] Anonymous <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/logic+symbols+--+table/6">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/logic+symbols+--+table/6">v6</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/logic+symbols+--+table">current</a>

   added line for $\&$ for additive conjunction

   Anonymous

   diff, v6, current

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 8th 2022
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexadded also row for *[[linear implication]]* <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/logic+symbols+--+table/7">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/logic+symbols+--+table/7">v7</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/logic+symbols+--+table">current</a>

   added also row for linear implication

   diff, v7, current

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 8th 2022
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexand one for *[[exponential conjunction]]* <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/logic+symbols+--+table/7">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/logic+symbols+--+table/7">v7</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/logic+symbols+--+table">current</a>

   and one for exponential conjunction

   diff, v7, current

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthornLab edit announcer
   • CommentTimeNov 8th 2022
   • PermaLink
   Author: nLab edit announcer
   Format: MarkdownItexadded section for [[type theory]]/[[propositions as types]], moved [[function type]] over to that section, and added symbols for [[product type]], [[dependent product type]], [[sum type]], [[dependent sum type]], [[empty type]], and [[unit type]] Anonymous <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/logic+symbols+--+table/9">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/logic+symbols+--+table/9">v9</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/logic+symbols+--+table">current</a>

   added section for type theory/propositions as types, moved function type over to that section, and added symbols for product type, dependent product type, sum type, dependent sum type, empty type, and unit type

   Anonymous

   diff, v9, current