Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Hm, my impression is that you changed one correct expression to an equivalent correct expression.
But for the argument to follow the first correct expression is the one needed! On the other hand, this follows indeed using your correct expression.
So I guess we want both expressions. I have now implemented that. I have also renamed that object C into K, since the ambient category is already called C and so there was a bad notation clash. Probably that didn't help to clarify the situation. Please have another look and see if it is better now.
Hm ,wait, actually you are right and I am wrong in that the expression is needed in the following, and is not. That latter is needed to see things like and the like.
Allright, so thanks for catching that.
1 to 4 of 4