Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > nLab Technical Matters: how to created a new environment?

Bottom of Page

1 to 5 of 5

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2010

    People want to know if it is possible to create a new formal environment Axiom analogous to the existing environments Definition , Theorem , Proof , etc.

    Does anyone know?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2010

    Yes it is. There's instructions over at the instiki instiki http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/wiki/instiki/show/Theorems. The CSS stuff is simple, the latex exporter needs a little technical jiggery-pokery but that would be easy to do.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2010

    Thanks, Andrew.

    (I wish I could edit the titles of my posts. I keep making silly typos in the titles, which is embarrassing. )

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2010
    • (edited Mar 15th 2010)

    You don't really need a new environment unless you want them counted separately. Just write

    +-- {: .num_defn}
###### Axiom
(most important axiom)

Everything that I want to prove is true.
=--

    (for example).

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorIan_Durham
    • CommentTimeMar 16th 2010
    This comment is invalid XHTML+MathML+SVG; displaying source. <div> <blockquote>Everything that I want to prove is true.<br/></blockquote><br/><br/>If everything you want to prove is true, then you shouldn't need to prove it! :-) </div>

1 to 5 of 5

  1.