Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2010

    People want to know if it is possible to create a new formal environment Axiom analogous to the existing environments Definition , Theorem , Proof , etc.

    Does anyone know?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2010

    Yes it is. There's instructions over at the instiki instiki http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/wiki/instiki/show/Theorems. The CSS stuff is simple, the latex exporter needs a little technical jiggery-pokery but that would be easy to do.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2010

    Thanks, Andrew.

    (I wish I could edit the titles of my posts. I keep making silly typos in the titles, which is embarrassing. )

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2010
    • (edited Mar 15th 2010)

    You don't really need a new environment unless you want them counted separately. Just write

    +-- {: .num_defn}
    ###### Axiom
    (most important axiom)
    
    Everything that I want to prove is true.
    =--
    

    (for example).

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorIan_Durham
    • CommentTimeMar 16th 2010
    This comment is invalid XHTML+MathML+SVG; displaying source. <div> <blockquote>Everything that I want to prove is true.<br/></blockquote><br/><br/>If everything you want to prove is true, then you shouldn't need to prove it! :-) </div>