Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
    • CommentTimeFeb 16th 2019
    • (edited Feb 16th 2019)

    At the back of my mind, I am persistently a little troubled by how easily the nLab may currently be attacked. Equally, I am a little troubled by the fact that there quite a few unannounced edits, especially by Anonymous or attackers, even though these edits are typically harmless.

    It would be significant work to implement a proper login mechanism for the nLab, but it occurred to me that, since the nLab is quite mature, we could introduce a de facto mechanism by requiring that all edits must be announced by Anonymous or any author with less than a certain threshold of edits. Thus guest posting would still be allowed, but it must come with announcement.

    Let me know what you think. I’m happy not to implement it if it’s not felt to be a good idea.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 16th 2019

    Sounds good to me.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2019

    Let’s see, so if I understand correctly, you’re suggesting that if an edit is signed by someone without a long enough history of edits, then the edit will automatically be announced at the forum whether or not they enter any text?

    One potential problem I see is that without an actual login mechanism, it would be easy to defeat this by impersonating one of the regulars, entering their name in the signing box. We’ve gotten away without an actual login mechanism for so long partly because there’s little to no incentive for anyone to impersonate anyone else, but this would actually be creating such an incentive.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2019

    We could try again to have strictly every edit announced.

    This will lead to some noise, but maybe we get used to it.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2019

    Ugh. Maybe if we made a separate forum category for trivial-change announcements, and excluded it from the RSS feeds the way we do for the spam category.

  1. Re #4: I think I agree with Mike that this might be a bit too much, I think things are about right at the moment, and I’d like not to disturb that too much.

    But I also see #3. I did consider that, and had some ideas for how we might mitigate it a bit, but it’s true that this might introduce more problems than it solves.

    Maybe I just have to bite the bullet and implement a login mechanism!