# Start a new discussion

## Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

## Site Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
• CommentTimeApr 16th 2019

Finally made a page for the concept mentioned by Mike in a 2016 n-Café discussion.

I’d be interested in examples that weren’t already relevance monoidal categories (ie, not symmetric).

• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
• CommentTimeApr 16th 2019

I should check (or someone can confirm) if the smash product makes sense for pointed objects in an arbitrary (cocomplete etc) monoidal category. Then this might be an example of the sort I was looking for.

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
• CommentTimeApr 17th 2019

• CommentRowNumber4.
• CommentAuthorSam Staton
• CommentTimeApr 17th 2019

Mentioned “copyability” terminology for this

• CommentRowNumber5.
• CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
• CommentTimeApr 18th 2019

Changed $\vee$ to $\wedge$.

• CommentRowNumber6.
• CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
• CommentTimeApr 18th 2019

Thanks, Todd. Don’t know why I used \vee

• CommentRowNumber7.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeDec 9th 2020

The first sentence used to seemingly claim that in a general monoidal categoy there are no morphisms of the form $x \to x \otimes x$. I have reworded a bit.

• CommentRowNumber8.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJan 19th 2021
• (edited Jan 19th 2021)

I have expanded out (here) the example of the smash product on pointed sets/spaces. Since the same example also serves in related entries, I have written it into its own entry smash-monoidal diagonals – section and !includeed it here

• CommentRowNumber9.
• CommentAuthorRodMcGuire
• CommentTimeJan 19th 2021

trying to see the diff of monoidal category with diagonals gave me

500 Internal Server Error

several times repeatedly. But while I was trying to track the error down and report it it went away.

• CommentRowNumber10.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJan 19th 2021

Even without the error message, the diff on my revision 7 is not very useful, as it fails to render all the LaTeX-style code. My understanding is that this is because the renovated parser operates only on the public page, but nor on diff-s nor on the page history.

For that reason I try to keep pointing directly to where I made changes. In the present case, the changes are the entirety of this section.