Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at surgery theory
stub for constructible sheaf
on Pontryagin’s identification of unstable Cohomotopy of closed manifolds with cobordism classes of their normally framed submanifolds – to go alongside Thom’s theorem (which is originally the analogous statement but for oriented submanifolds and maps into a universal -Thom space) and the Pontryagin-Thom construction (which has come to be the term used for all kinds of generalizations and variants that neither Pontryagin nor Thom probably ever dreamed of).
For the moment the bulk of the material is copied over from the existing section at Cohomotopy, but I hope to improve a bit on this a little later.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at Pontryagin’s theorem
I have finally dug out
which has English translations of Pontryagin’s old articles, like the one with the famous mistake and the one with the famous fix of the mistake.
So I have added the pointer here, and expanded the commentary around it a little.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at homotopy groups of spheres
I have added a subsection Applications – In Cohomotopy and Cobordism theory highlighting how the properness of maps from compact to Hausdorff spaces is what makes the unstable Pontryagin-Thom isomorphism tick – for closed (hence compact) manifolds.
(This seems profound enough an example to justify mentioning. Also, it’s a point that tends to get lost in accounts of the theorem…)
This is a page with fully explicit component computations of properties of the Hodge star operator on Minkowski spacetime. It is a bare sub-section, to be !include
-ed inside sections of relevant entries (under “Examples” at Hodge star operator and under “Properties” at Minkowski spacetime)
created stub for Pfaffian line bundle, because I needed the link to the entry and to the single reference currently given there. Will fill in more details later today.
In the course of this I also created an extremely stubby entry fermion.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at AdS-CFT correspondence
added pointer to:
stub for Landweber exact functor theorem, to be expanded
added pointer to
and re-arranged the references slightly, moving those on supersymmetry to a dedicated subsection
a bare list of references, to be !include
-ed inside the lists of references of relevant entries, such as at D=6 N=(2,0) SCFT, functorial field theory and extended TQFT
created Thom’s transversality theorem
A stub, to provide a home for today’s
For discussion at geometry of physics I need a way to point to the concept of “locality” in QFT, so I gave it a small entry: local quantum field theory.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at Khovanov homology, movie and elsewhere
A stub.
I was looking for a canonical reference to go with the term “movie” in relation to higher dimensional bordisms/tangles/knots. Preferably with the words like “A movie of … is …”.
For the moment I just have a pointer to the original Carter-Saito 93
am splitting this off as a stand-alone statement (from complex projective space)
Have cleaned-up the formulation of statement and proof and have generalized from ground ring the complex numbers to reals, complex numbers and quaternions.
I created a seperate Kan object which was desribed in internal infinity-groupoid before. The combinatoric part in the motivation is not needed, yet.
Added a link to slides from a talk about HoTT-style stack semantics:
Added this to references. It looks like the page needs some attention.
An account of how the tensor product of PROs and the smash product of pointed spaces are two facets of the same construction is in
- Amar Hadzihasanovic, The smash product of monoidal theories, (arXiv:2101.10361)
started adding some actual content to categorical semantics: wrote sections defining the interpretation of
Contexts and type judgements
terms
substitution
in dependent type theory.
We had (still have) a proof of the contractibility of some version of in the Definition-section at n-sphere.
Since that doesn’t seem to be the right place for that material, and in order to make it easier to link to and its contractibility, I am giving it its own page here.
In creating this page, I have:
copied over the material of the section n-sphere – Definition – Infinite-dimensional sphere;
expanded out the first paragraph into a new Idea-section here;
added a section with the definition as a colimit over relative cell complex inclusions and the quick proof of weak contractibility from that.
So the previous discussion in terms of infinite-dimensional unit spheres in LCTVSs and/or in shift spaces is currently both here as well as inside n-sphere. But I suggest we remove it at the latter place, and just leave the link to this new page here.
added a handful of further references to Witten genus, with brief comments.
Also ended up splitting off a stub for sigma-orientation.
I have given complex conjugation its own page, in order to have a way to point to quaternionic conjugation etc. (Previously “complex conjugation” just redirected to “complex number”.)
But the system has a hiccup: The page exists now, but the announcement didn’t get through to here. And any attempt to edit the page first leads to the system claiming that I have locked the page and, ignoring that, to a 500 error message.
So I can’t fix the page now. I’ll leave it as is for the time being.
The first line of the Idea-section read:
Every magma has an opposite in which the operation goes the other direction.
This rather sounded like talking about co-magmas. I have replaced this now with the following more lengthy but less ambiguous sentence:
The opposite of a magma – hence of a set with a binary operation – has the same underlying set of elements, but binary operation changed by reversing the order of the factors: .
Also I touched the Definition-section, trying to beautify a little, both the wording and the formulas.
added this item to the list: